The Impact of a Medical Education Research Faculty Development Program on Career Development, Through the Lens of Social Cognitive Career Theory

Abstract

Objectives: The Medical Education Research Certificate at the Council of Residency Directors in EmergencyMedicine (MERC at CORD), a specialized adaptation of the Association of American Medical Colleges MERC program, provides faculty development in education research in emergency medicine. However, its long-term influence on career development remains unknown. Our study explored the impact of MERC at CORD on career development through the lens of social cognitive career (SCC) theory.Methods: This was a prospective qualitative study using a constructivist/interpretivist paradigm to assess longterm career development outcomes. A purposeful randomized stratified sampling strategy of MERC at CORD graduates (2011-2014) ensured diversity of representation (sex, region, number of research publications, and project group leadership). Subjects were invited by e-mail to participate in semistructured phone interviews. Thematic analysis by two independent reviewers followed an iterative process until saturation was reached.Results: Twelve graduates were interviewed. All engaged with MERC at CORD early in their careers with minimal previous education research experience. Currently, all hold medical education leadership positions. Graduates had a mean of 19.3 publications (range = 9-43). Themes explaining reasons for participating in MERC at CORD include: desire for education research skills, recommendation of mentors/colleagues, and accessibility. Themes citing the program's value to career development include networking/collaboration, mentorship, informational framework to build upon, and the application of theoretical knowledge through experiential learning. MERC at CORD impacted career development aligning with the core domains of SCC theory including self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and goals. Conclusion:MERC at CORD enhanced the long-term career development of participants by providing a core knowledge framework in a mentored, experiential learning environment. Participants identified themes aligned with SCC theory as influential in their long-term career advancement in medical education including the development of education research skills, successful completion of education research, career acceleration, promotion, niche development, and formulation of professional goals.

Is it worth it? A qualitative analysis of the impact of medical education fellowships on careers

“…The importance of this ecosystem on career development cannot be overstated; specifically, our participants emphasized the positive influence of their training programs that allowed for protected time, acquisition of new skills, and an opportunity to apply what they learned. This aligns with prior literature identifying protected time, skill development, and experiential learning as important to professional development 26–29 . Additionally, our findings demonstrate that mentors and educator communities are important influences on the professional development of clinician educators.…”

“…Additionally, our findings demonstrate that mentors and educator communities are important influences on the professional development of clinician educators. This is not surprising and is corroborated by multiple prior studies that demonstrate the importance of mentors and their respective impact on academic careers 26,27,29–31 . The importance of a titled role for fellows is interesting and prior literature has noted that professional titles matter 32,33 .…”

“Not just a checkbox”: A qualitative study of the resident scholarly experience

“…This is aligned with the core tenets of social cognitive career theory. [32][33][34] Importantly, though, our data also suggested that some highly productive residents concluded that a future in academic medicine was not their interest. We feel this is a particularly valuable finding: You do not have to like broccoli, but you have to try it.…”

“…This is aligned with prior work highlighting the value of mentorship for scholarly success. 32,35 Mentors may do well to lower the bar of entry into scholarly activity for trainees and then once involved empowering them to take ownership of important pieces of the project. Residents may do more and higher quality projects if their mentors support them in essential roles.…”

The next generation of researchers:One‐yearoutcome data from theSAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education(ARMED MedEd) program

“…Instead, programs for CEs usually focus on teaching skills (e.g., delivering lectures, creating curricula), with relatively little attention paid to producing education scholarship 5,6 . There are limited programs focused specifically on education research, and these typically target earlier career faculty or those with nascent skills who wish to explore the basic principles of research using education‐specific methodology 7–11 . None focuses on grant development, nor the creation of a network of trained researchers to promote high‐caliber, multi‐institutional scholarship.…”