2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Academic Facility Type and Case Volume on Survival in Patients Undergoing Curative Radiation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also the possibility that patients initially seen at lower volume centers were referred to institutes with more experience with bladder preservation and such patients are not identifiable in our analysis. Additionally, our results are in contrast to a NCDB study published in 2018 which investigated the impact of academic facility type and case volume on survival for bladder cancer patients undergoing curative intent radiation therapy [38]. These authors found that both academic facility type and case volume were not associated with survival outcomes [38].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also the possibility that patients initially seen at lower volume centers were referred to institutes with more experience with bladder preservation and such patients are not identifiable in our analysis. Additionally, our results are in contrast to a NCDB study published in 2018 which investigated the impact of academic facility type and case volume on survival for bladder cancer patients undergoing curative intent radiation therapy [38]. These authors found that both academic facility type and case volume were not associated with survival outcomes [38].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, our results are in contrast to a NCDB study published in 2018 which investigated the impact of academic facility type and case volume on survival for bladder cancer patients undergoing curative intent radiation therapy [38]. These authors found that both academic facility type and case volume were not associated with survival outcomes [38]. In their study, however, nearly half (48%) of the patients did not receive concurrent chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…[30][31][32][34][35][36][37][38]40,43,44 The definition for a high volume center ranged from > 3.25 to 25-66 cystectomies per year. The study by Bajaj et al 33 utilized academic vs non-academic center type as the exposure variable. They concluded that treatment with curative radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy at an academic hospital was not associated with improved overall survival when compared to the same treatment at a non-academic hospital.…”
Section: Hospital Type and Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…201802144S; Shanghai, China). For the generation of xenografts, 1x10 6 BCa cells (in 0.1 ml PBS) were subcutaneously injected into the back of each mouse. The first batch of mice were randomly divided into the following five groups (n=3/group): i) Saline control group; ii) 5637 group; iii) 5637R group; iv) T24 group; and v) T24R group.…”
Section: Colony Formation Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past 20 years, as MIBC treatments have aimed to preserve the bladder and improve quality of life, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy for radiation sensitization, and immunotherapy have continuously improved (5). This has increased the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate to 40-50%, resulting in improved patient quality of life (6). For patients that are medically unsuitable for RC, or those who prefer non-surgical alternatives, RT and concurrent chemotherapy are currently the most effective treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%