The Impact of Acceptance Versus Control Rationales on Pain Tolerance

Abstract

Acceptance approaches , which have been receiving increased attention within behavior therapy, seek to undermine the linkage between private events and overt behavior, rather than attempting to control the form or frequency of private events per se. Research comparing control versus acceptance strategies is limited. The present study examined the behavioral and subjective impact of a control-based versus acceptance rationale, using a cold pressor task. Subjects in the acceptance group demonstrated greater tolerance of pain compared to the controlbased and placebo groups. Only the control-based rationale targeted the subjective experience of pain but it did not differ across rationales. Results confirmed that acceptance was effective in manipulating the believability of reason giving, a key process measure. By encouraging individuals to distance themselves from their private events, acceptance methods may help reduce the use of emotional reasons to explain behavior and hence shift concern from moderating thoughts and fee lings to experiencing the consequences of one's action. Acceptance is a promising new technique. Its effect is all the more surprising given that it teaches principles (e.g., "thoughts do not cause behavior") that run counter both to the popular culture and to the dominant approaches within empirical clinical intervention.Requests for reprints should be sent to

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes

“…RFT has proven itself successful so far in modeling the nature, acquisition, and impact of higher cognition at the behavioral, emotional, and neurobiological level. For example, RFT researchers have successfully modeled analogy and metaphor (Stewart, Barnes-Holmes, & Roche, 2004), trained perspective taking (xx), ad RFT tasks can successfully model the natural language tasks studied in basic cognitive science, such as semantic priming (Bissett & Hayes, 1999;Barnes-Holmes. Xxx 2003) or xxx.…”

The Psychological Flexibility Model: A Basis for Integration and Progress in Psychological Approaches to Chronic Pain Management

“…27,28,29,30,31,42,47,76 The PF model as a whole is currently not well known within the field of chronic pain. Some of its six constituent processes of PF, however, are gaining prominence, especially acceptance, 4,10,11,18,26,56,58,69,84,87,97 and values-based action. 55,56,59,67,84 Even the least well recognized processes of PF now have some empirical support, including present-focused awareness, 51 cognitive defusion and self-as-observer, 53 and committed action.…”

In search of meaning: Values in modern clinical behavior analysis

“…For a number of years, analogue studies have demonstrated acceptance of difficult or distressing experiences in the laboratory (e.g., Hayes et al, 1999;Zettle, 2005). Citing the theoretical rationale that values provide the context in which acceptance is possible (one does not typically accept discomfort simply for its own merit), assessing the additive impact of personal values to an acceptance intervention for a distressing task is the logical next step.…”