2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of calcium sulfate and inert solids accumulation in post-combustion calcium looping systems

Abstract: Postcombustion CO 2 capture by calcium looping (CaL) is being rapidly developed for coal combustion applications. This work discusses the impact of the accumulation of CaSO 4 and other inert solids on CO 2 capture efficiency and the overall CaL process performance. Several process configurations are considered, and the mass and energy balances and an updated carbonator reactor model are solved for each configuration.The minimum fresh sorbent requirements for sustaining a certain level of CO 2 capture efficienc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second inconvenient is the progressive deactivation of the sorbent along the successive carb/calc cycles that makes necessary to periodically introduce a fresh limestone makeup into the calciner. CaO deactivation may occur due to the screening effect of external agents such as ash or SO 2 produced during oxycombustion, which leads to the irreversible sulphation of the CaO particles [9,13,19,20]. Yet, deactivation is mostly caused by the drastic loss of surface area of the CaO grains when calcination takes place under high CO 2 partial pressure and high temperatures, which enhances aggregation and subsequent sintering of the nascent CaO nanocrystals during the CaCO 3 /CaO transformation [21].…”
Section: The Partially Carbonated Particles Are Then Transported Intomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second inconvenient is the progressive deactivation of the sorbent along the successive carb/calc cycles that makes necessary to periodically introduce a fresh limestone makeup into the calciner. CaO deactivation may occur due to the screening effect of external agents such as ash or SO 2 produced during oxycombustion, which leads to the irreversible sulphation of the CaO particles [9,13,19,20]. Yet, deactivation is mostly caused by the drastic loss of surface area of the CaO grains when calcination takes place under high CO 2 partial pressure and high temperatures, which enhances aggregation and subsequent sintering of the nascent CaO nanocrystals during the CaCO 3 /CaO transformation [21].…”
Section: The Partially Carbonated Particles Are Then Transported Intomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent paper [20] illustrates with mass and energy balances the operational and fuel composition windows that make this synergy possible. SO 2 is produced in the CFBC as well as in the oxy CFB calciner due to the combustion of coal.…”
Section: Figure 1 Principal Reactors Of a Cal System Integrated Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, sorbent make-up rate is a technical parameter having major influence on plant economics. The sorbent used in CaL unit has to be continuously renew due to two important factors: solid attrition caused by high operating temperature which produce the degradation of sorbent capacity to capture CO 2 and sorbent contamination with ash from additional coal used in the calciner [32,33]. As an illustrative example, Fig.…”
Section: Estimation Of Operational and Maintenance Costs Cost Of Electmentioning
confidence: 99%