2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of computer display height and desk design on 3D posture during information technology work by young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
44
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
44
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this study was to assess the independent and interactive effects of display height and forearm support on neck and upper limb muscle activity during work with paper and computer. The results of this study provide complementary evidence to the posture data collected during the study and reported in a companion paper (Straker et al, 2008).…”
Section: Interaction Effects Of Display Height and Forearm Support Onsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aim of this study was to assess the independent and interactive effects of display height and forearm support on neck and upper limb muscle activity during work with paper and computer. The results of this study provide complementary evidence to the posture data collected during the study and reported in a companion paper (Straker et al, 2008).…”
Section: Interaction Effects Of Display Height and Forearm Support Onsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In our study, the high display condition resulted in surprisingly small reductions in CES (À2%) muscle activity from the mid display condition despite substantial reductions in head (15°) and neck (6°) flexion and gaze angle (23°) (Straker et al, 2008). Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The location of each marker was recorded and automatically digitized using DARTFISH software (Dartfish Co., Ltd., Lausanne, Switzerland). Head angle was defined as the angle between the vertical and the line through the tragus and the lateral orbital margin, and neck angle was defined as the angle between the vertical and the line through the C7 spinous process and the tragus [8,[14][15][16]. Trunk tilt angle was defined as the angle between the vertical and the line joining the trochanter and C7.…”
Section: Postural Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RMS was normalized to the resting RMS [16][17][18][19]. The standard is to normalize EMG to the value recorded during a maximum voluntary contraction.…”
Section: Electromyography (Emg)mentioning
confidence: 99%