1998
DOI: 10.1159/000016130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Consanguinity Worldwide

Abstract: Consanguineous marriages have been practiced for hundreds of years in many parts of the world. The rate of congenital malformations among the offspring is 2.5 times higher than that among the offspring of unrelated parents, mainly due to the expression of autosomal-recessive disorders, and hospitalization for these reasons causes a major financial burden. An increase in sterility and in the rates of abortion, stillbirths, perinatal losses and neonatal deaths has been reported by some authors but not by others.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
111
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary cause of infant death among Bedouins was congenital malformations (5.8 per 1,000 live births in 2010) (Belmaker 2010). The most important factor contributing to the increased rate of congenital malformations among Bedouins and subsequent infant morbidity and mortality is consanguineous marriages (Bittles 2001;Jaber et al 1998;Weitzman et al 2000;Bromiker et al 2004;Hamamy 2012). Consanguineous marriages are very common among the Bedouins, and the reported rate was 60.1 % in 1992 (Vardi-Saliternik et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary cause of infant death among Bedouins was congenital malformations (5.8 per 1,000 live births in 2010) (Belmaker 2010). The most important factor contributing to the increased rate of congenital malformations among Bedouins and subsequent infant morbidity and mortality is consanguineous marriages (Bittles 2001;Jaber et al 1998;Weitzman et al 2000;Bromiker et al 2004;Hamamy 2012). Consanguineous marriages are very common among the Bedouins, and the reported rate was 60.1 % in 1992 (Vardi-Saliternik et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are thus many reasons, both at a societal level and at an individual level, to aim for a modernization of the mate choice in groups that currently maintain a traditional consanguineous marriage tradition for a longterm social change. A similar genetic persistence of economic disadvantages might also exist on a macroeconomic level (Jaber et al, 1998), where some countries or regions carry a heavier burden of genetic disease through widespread kin marriage or small founder populations with limited genetic exchange (Bittles et al, 1991;Rudan et al, 2006;Verma, 2000).…”
Section: Self-perpetuating Marginalization and Genetic Self-mutilationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Additional studies conducted by, [14,[50][51][52]. verified that, the increased risk for a significant birth defect in offspring of a first cousin union range between 1.7 and 2.8% above the risk of the general population risk.…”
Section: Consanguinity Is a Genetics Dilemma And A Social Problemmentioning
confidence: 93%