2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of contact lens wear on ocular surface mucins using a novel clinical fluorescence imaging system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, these studies that have examined the effect of contact lens wear on the tear film, and associations between contact lens discomfort and changes to the tear film biochemistry have found only a few possible associations. Symptomatic lens wearers may have decreased concentrations of β-2-microglobulin, proline-rich protein-4, lacritin, secretoglobin 1D1 [391] wax esters and wax ester to triacylglycerol ratio [213] and lower amounts of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine or sialic acid on their lid-wiper regions [425], but increased concentrations of secretoglobin 2A2, albumin, DMBT-1, prolactin-inducible protein [391], triacylglycerols [213] IL-17A [449] and LTB 4 [455] in their tears. However, what the association is between these changes and whether any are initiators of the symptomatology or merely bystanders in the events associated with symptomatology has yet to be elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In summary, these studies that have examined the effect of contact lens wear on the tear film, and associations between contact lens discomfort and changes to the tear film biochemistry have found only a few possible associations. Symptomatic lens wearers may have decreased concentrations of β-2-microglobulin, proline-rich protein-4, lacritin, secretoglobin 1D1 [391] wax esters and wax ester to triacylglycerol ratio [213] and lower amounts of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine or sialic acid on their lid-wiper regions [425], but increased concentrations of secretoglobin 2A2, albumin, DMBT-1, prolactin-inducible protein [391], triacylglycerols [213] IL-17A [449] and LTB 4 [455] in their tears. However, what the association is between these changes and whether any are initiators of the symptomatology or merely bystanders in the events associated with symptomatology has yet to be elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean MUC5AC concentration in tears was lower in the group that worked longer hours (office work using visual display terminals) compared to the group that worked shorter hours, but no significant MUC5AC concentration difference was related to dryness and other ocular symptoms [424]. Using fluorescein-labelled wheat germ agglutinin to stain N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and sialic acid sugar residues on the ocular surface (by inference the mucin glycocalyx), demonstrated that soft contact lens wear (disposable or frequent replacement lenses, no indication of whether the lenses were hydrogels or SiHys) decreased the levels of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine or sialic acid on the ocular surface [425]. The amount of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine or sialic acid has been correlated to the tear film breakup time [426].…”
Section: Contact Lenses and Alterations In Tear Mucinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, increased microvascular density in the lid wiper was significantly correlated with decreased contact lens comfort [266]. Recently, a study investigating the use of fluorescein-labelled wheat germ agglutinin as a marker for ocular surface mucins found that symptomatic lens wearers showed reduced wheat germ agglutinin fluorescence in the lid wiper, which may suggest altered density and/or structure of mucins [267].…”
Section: Lid Wiper Epitheliopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ocular mucin with hydrophilic properties and rich negative charges is the main component of the tear film, which benefits to stabilize the tear film, wet the cornea, and prevent the invasion of pathogens (Georgiev et al, 2019;Read et al, 2019). Meanwhile, it also prevent the effective dose of the drug from reaching the target tissue (Hori 2018).…”
Section: Surface Hydrophobicity Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%