Proceedings of the International Workshop on App Market Analytics 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2993259.2993268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of cross-platform development approaches for mobile applications from the user's perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Native look & feel and short reaction times are direct consequences. Apps appear and can be interacted with in the same way as platform-specific apps respectively of the mobile operating system itself; the performance is high at least for carefully designed apps [28]. Obviously, native development was the starting point for app development when platforms were newly released.…”
Section: Baseline: Native Development and Webappsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native look & feel and short reaction times are direct consequences. Apps appear and can be interacted with in the same way as platform-specific apps respectively of the mobile operating system itself; the performance is high at least for carefully designed apps [28]. Obviously, native development was the starting point for app development when platforms were newly released.…”
Section: Baseline: Native Development and Webappsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They differ from Hybrid apps in that the rendered user interface is actual native interface components [9], [21]. As such, the user interface is as native as a regular native app written in a platform-specific language would be.…”
Section: Interpretedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research identified includes, but is not limited to, topics such as requirements for cross-platform tooling (Gaouar et al, 2016), development approach evaluation frameworks (Rieger and Majchrzak, 2016), energy consumption comparisons (Ciman and Gaggi, 2016), and end-user perception of cross-platform apps (Mercado et al, 2016;Malavolta et al, 2015a). Their contributions should be acknowledged as important foundation for future research on progressive web apps.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It typically not only reduces the development effort but also enables a quicker time-to-market (Rahul and Tolety, 2012). While its application and reputation varies in academia and industry communities (Puvvala et al, 2016;Mercado et al, 2016), the idea of a single code base -which can be deployed to multiple platformsis seen as appealing for a variety of reasons. These include, but are not limited to, budget, human resources, and existing knowledge (Corral et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%