“…Cultural proximity is crucial, especially to promote acceptance, participation and accessibility in dispute resolution, and while scholars have stressed the need of incorporating such proximity in international tribunals, they have failed to propose workable ways to do this. 47 Hence, one may conclude that workable methods of local justice are among the best ways to cope with diff erent conceptions of justice itself, avoiding the sort of homogeneity encouraged by Amnesty International and its ilk through rigidly legalistic, Western notions of justice. As pointed out by Jean Sternlight with respect to ADR methods, the Western concept of the rule of law should not be seen as an invariable end, but as a means to the end of justice in a much broader sense, 48 and this argument may be legitimately extended to local forms of ADR.…”