2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of dental metal artifacts on head and neck IMRT dose distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of this study, we Table 1 of Ref. [15]. Patients were immobilized using custom head molds, half facial thermoplastic masks, and treated using a bite tray coupled with an optical probe that attaches to the upper maximally dentition.…”
Section: Imrt Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purpose of this study, we Table 1 of Ref. [15]. Patients were immobilized using custom head molds, half facial thermoplastic masks, and treated using a bite tray coupled with an optical probe that attaches to the upper maximally dentition.…”
Section: Imrt Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,24,34,36] and references there in), the effects on the accuracy of H&N IMRT dose distribution due to dental-metal-artifacts in the treatment planning computerized tomography (CT) images has not been extensively studied. In our previous work [15] we have quantified the cold and the hot spots introduced by metal artifacts present in H&N treatment planning CT images in terms of physical dose. However, the dose response curves for a tumor and normal tissues are not linearbut sigmoid ('S') shaped [12,19,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, because the CT number can be calculated by the attenuation coefficient, this means that the photon energy also affects the CT number [1]. In addition, if a metal is inserted into a CT image, the metal artifact is generated and may cause changes in the CT number and photon density, so it can also influence the CT number [2][3][4]. The generation of high-density artifacts in CT images is primarily caused by missing projection data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hatton et al [14] used a cone beam CT on a Varian 2100iX linear accelerator (Varian, Palo Alto, CA) and showed that differences in CT number can influence the dose by up to 20 % in extreme cases. Kim et al [15] did not specify the manufacturer CT imager; nevertheless they showed that imaging artefacts can result in differences in treatment plan dose distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all phantom geometries, objects within the eFOV were geometrically overestimated with elongation of phantom shapes into the eFOV. The percentage increase in size ranged from 0.22 to 15.94 % over all phantoms considered. The difference between eFOV and sFOV CT numbers was dependent upon insert density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%