2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-74382010000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of different demand allocation rules on total stock levels

Peter Wanke

Abstract: This manuscript compares two different rules for allocating demands to serving facilities and their impact on total stock levels: the one proposed by Tyagi & Das (1998) and the cross filling practice. The EOQ and the ROP methods are used for setting cycle and safety stocks. Its is demonstrated that the minimization of the consolidated inventory levels within these rules leads to different allocation policies, frequently adopted by companies: one single facility sharing, dedicated facilities and full decentrali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding indicating the insignificant effect of stock holding on the supply chain management shows that it is not in line with previous studies such as Sheffi (2002) and Wanke (2011). This opposite finding could be explained by the fact that this study was conducted in a high technology industry where the cost of stock holding is very expensive.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The finding indicating the insignificant effect of stock holding on the supply chain management shows that it is not in line with previous studies such as Sheffi (2002) and Wanke (2011). This opposite finding could be explained by the fact that this study was conducted in a high technology industry where the cost of stock holding is very expensive.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In the case where is equal to 0 or 1 at the optimum, each decentralized location will be served exclusively by a single centralized location (independent distribution system). This means that there is no point in applying a centralized system where only one location takes over the responsibility of serving all decentralized locations [22].…”
Section: Ballou and Burnetas' Allocation Rule (Regular Transshipmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors such as Tyagi and Das [3], Ballou and Burnetas [4], Corbett and Rajaram [19], Wanke and Saliby [20], Wanke [18], and Wanke [21][22] consider the particular case where = = 2. In this paper, the presented results also concern the same case (two decentralized locations and two centralized locations).…”
Section: Linking Allocation Rules To Inventory Pooling Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gestão eficaz de estoques é essencial para concretizar o potencial pleno de qualquer cadeia de valor. [6][15] [16] Ao longo dos anos, a visão das empresas e organizações em relação à forma de lidar com a gestão de estoques têm evoluído bastante. Os estoques eram inicialmente utilizados como elemento-chave no balanceamento da cadeia de suprimentos (grande quantidade de material parado ao longo da cadeia), ou seja, funcionavam como um pulmão para a proteção contra as ineficiências do processo.…”
Section: Sistemas De Controle De Estoqueunclassified