2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Different DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories upon the Assessment of Human Gut Microbiota Composition by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Abstract: IntroductionDetermining bacterial community structure in fecal samples through DNA sequencing is an important facet of intestinal health research. The impact of different commercially available DNA extraction kits upon bacterial community structures has received relatively little attention. The aim of this study was to analyze bacterial communities in volunteer and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient fecal samples extracted using widely used DNA extraction kits in established gastrointestinal research lab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
189
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
13
189
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our replicate data sets were limited to only two different platforms and two hospitals, and the betweenhospital replicate data set was an unbalanced subset of the original cohort and rather small. Finally, since DNA extraction has been shown to be an important factor in microbiota composition variation (28,29), our replicate data sets did not include reisolation of the DNA, rather than reprocessing of the same DNA isolates. The DNA isolates were therefore stored until the two replicates were analyzed, which may also introduce some degree of variation.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our replicate data sets were limited to only two different platforms and two hospitals, and the betweenhospital replicate data set was an unbalanced subset of the original cohort and rather small. Finally, since DNA extraction has been shown to be an important factor in microbiota composition variation (28,29), our replicate data sets did not include reisolation of the DNA, rather than reprocessing of the same DNA isolates. The DNA isolates were therefore stored until the two replicates were analyzed, which may also introduce some degree of variation.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first DNA extraction step (EM), only a mild mechanical lysis using bead beating was applied. In the second extraction step (FP), the pellet from the first extraction was treated using the FastPrep instrument, which has been shown to crack even very recalcitrant soil bacteria and to retrieve up to 20-fold more DNA from gut samples than other methods (32). Unexpectedly, the abundances of all but three classes of bacteria were the same in the EM and FP DNA preparations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery of high-quality, high-purity representative DNA from environmental samples highlights the importance of the extraction efficacy of the microbial DNA from the initial samples (Fang et al 2014;Kennedy et al 2014;Mirsepasi et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%