The Impact of Different Feedback Types on Decision-Making in Simulation Based Training Environments

Astwood, Randy S.; Buskirk, Wendi L. Van; Cornejo, Jessica M.; Dalton, Joseph M.

doi:10.1177/154193120805202606

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In many cases, studies touch on the effectiveness of different types of feedback in computer-based or training scenarios. In one such example, feedback is categorized according to three types: outcome (i.e., providing specific information about achieved performance), process (i.e., providing advice without specific performance information), and normative (i.e., providing a performance comparison to others), with process feedback being the most effective 41 .…”

Section: Characteristics Of Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Two-Dimensional Typology for Characterizing Student Peer and Instructor Feedback in Capstone Design Project Courses

Hurst¹,

Nespoli²

2016 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ada Hurst is a Lecturer in the Department of Management Sciences at the University of Waterloo. She has taught and coordinated the capstone design project course for the Management Engineering program since 2011. She also teaches courses in organizational behavior, theory, and technology. She received a Bachelor of Applied Science in Electrical Engineering, followed by Master of Applied Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in Management Sciences, all from the University of Waterloo. Ada's research and teaching interests include decision making under uncertainty, subjective probability, gender issues in STEM disciplines, design teaching, experiential and online learning, team processes, and expert vs. novice review in engineering design. Prof. Oscar G. Nespoli, University of WaterlooOscar Nespoli is a Continuing Lecturer in Engineering and Mechanical Design in the Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering at the University of Waterloo (Waterloo). Oscar joined Waterloo following a 23-year career in research, engineering and management practice in industry and government. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of engineering design methodologies, design practice, engineering education and high performance, lightweight, composite materials design. Oscar is passionate about teaching engineering and, as part of his current role, maintains strong industry-university relations and a commitment to remain close to engineering design and management practice.Before joining Waterloo, Oscar held the position of Sr. Program Manager at L-3 Communications Wescam (L-3 Wescam), a manufacturer of airborne surveillance systems for public safety, security and defense markets. Oscar had been employed at L-3 Wescam for 11 years, where he led multi-disciplinary teams toward the successful development and commercialization of several products to various markets. He was responsible for L-3 Wescam's largest defense programs.Oscar worked at the Canadian Forces Department of National Defense failure analysis lab, where he was the Canadian Project Officer for an international program on F/A-18 bonded repair, and prior to that, a Research Engineer at the Canadian Space Agency. Oscar designed and qualified space flight hardware for a space experiment for Space Shuttle Flight STS-52 in 1993.Earlier in his career Oscar led the design and development of products employing composite materials at Owens Corning Canada and contributed to the development of novel production machinery for the footwear industry with Bata Engineering.Oscar earned a Master of Applied Science degree in Mechanical Engineering specializing in lightweight composite material structures from the University of Waterloo, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Queen's University (Kingston, Ontario, Canada). He became a licensed professional engineer in 1986.c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A two-dimensional typology for characterizing student peer and instructor feedback in capstone design project courses Abst...

show abstract

Section: Characteristics Of Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%