2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of efficiency on discretionary loans/finance loss provision: A comparative study of Islamic and conventional banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be argued that higher profitability can be related to larger banks. However, it does not mean that higher profitable banks are more efficient because efficiency is not the same as profitability (Shawtari et al 2015b). This is one of the shortcomings of profitability measures.…”
Section: Panel Techniques Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be argued that higher profitability can be related to larger banks. However, it does not mean that higher profitable banks are more efficient because efficiency is not the same as profitability (Shawtari et al 2015b). This is one of the shortcomings of profitability measures.…”
Section: Panel Techniques Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that market power is important for the efficiency of the banks. Other studies utilised factors such as non-performing loans, liquidity risks, non-interest/finance income, required reserve by central banks, and profitability as determinants of efficiency (Shawtari et al 2015b). Gunes and Yilmaz (2016) examined the PTE and SE determinants for Turkish conventional deposit banks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study of Shawtari et al (2015) compares the discretionary loans/finance loss provision (DLLP) of Islamic and CBs operating in Yemen. Using data of 16 banks over the period 1996-2011, the authors tested seven hypotheses with relation to DLLP.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beck et al (2013) reported that the business model for Islamic banks, to a certain extent, is similar to conventional banks, except in their quality of assets and capitalisations which exhibited some differences. Othman and Efficiency, Asset Quality and Stability of the Banking Sector in Malaysia Mersni (2014) and Shawtari, Saiti, Abdul Razak and Ariff (2015) reported that Islamic banks and conventional banks are similar in using their discretion over loan/finance loss provisions. Mirza et al (2015) found that Islamic banks are more stable and secure in terms of their asset quality compared to their conventional counterparts.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%