“…As a mirror of immediate, unconditional self-interest (Queiroz, 2016), TINA precludes the possibility of individual liberty under a system of collective deliberation, i.e., a system of ultimate intentional lawmakers (the peoples' sovereign (Locke, 1679(Locke, [1960) or the universal sovereign (Kant, 1797)). For example, neoliberal policies (e.g., fiscal consolidation, cuts to social security, the privatization of public property, the liberalization of collective bargaining, and the shrinking of pensions (Barro 2009;Cochrane 2009)) have caused harmful effects, including poverty and inequality (Ball et al, 2013;Edmiston, 2014;Greer 2014;Stiglitz, 2013), higher rates of suicide (Antonakakis and Collins 2014), state bankruptcy (Teubal, 2004), and state authoritarianism (Brown, 2006(Brown, , 2015Bruff, 2014;Kreuder-Sonnen and Zangl, 2015;Orphanides, 2014;Schmidt and Thatcher, 2014). If individuals are tempted to appeal to intentional political policies when facing these effects, TINA commands that, instead of looking for public solutions issuing from intentional public deliberation, they should only obey the rules of the spontaneous order.…”