2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71826-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of focused ion beam induced damage on scanning spreading resistance microscopy measurements

Abstract: Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy is a well-established technique for obtaining quantitative two- and three-dimensional carrier profiles in semiconductor devices with sub-nm spatial resolution. However, for sub-100 nm devices, the use of focused ion beam becomes inevitable for exposing the region of interest on a sample cross section. In this work, we investigate the impact of the focused ion beam milling on spreading resistance analysis and we show that the electrical effect of the focused ion beam ext… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffusion of implanted Ga into the target material, in lateral and primary beam directions, and the effect of annealing on Ga diffusion were reported. Depending on Ga ion dose, energy, microstructure of target material, incident angle and target temperature, maximum lengths of Ga diffusion up to several hundred nanometres, along the lateral direction, were noticed [21,46,47]. In crystalline Si, the cause of damage is attributed to ion channelling effects in addition to point defect creation and migration (rather than the long beam tail effect).…”
Section: Nanoparticle Cluster Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diffusion of implanted Ga into the target material, in lateral and primary beam directions, and the effect of annealing on Ga diffusion were reported. Depending on Ga ion dose, energy, microstructure of target material, incident angle and target temperature, maximum lengths of Ga diffusion up to several hundred nanometres, along the lateral direction, were noticed [21,46,47]. In crystalline Si, the cause of damage is attributed to ion channelling effects in addition to point defect creation and migration (rather than the long beam tail effect).…”
Section: Nanoparticle Cluster Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulated pure Ga on the surface of Si was often found to be unstable at room temperature due to its low melting point. Segregation of Ga droplets on Si (100) and the effects of implantation scheme, annealing temperature (as high as 600 • C) and Arsenic flux to form stable GaAs compound are earlier reported for large area scans [47]. Therefore, post-annealing temperature, duration and the annealing atmosphere are the critical parameters and they need to be carefully optimized in order to obtain precipitation of stable Ga-based compounds on the surface.…”
Section: Nanoparticle Cluster Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its significance becomes particularly pronounced regarding sample preparation accuracy for in situ and operando tests at the micro-and nanoscale. However, caution must be exercised, because FIB milling involves bombarding the material of interest with high-energy ions, which can induce surface alterations and structural defects, including recrystallization, amorphization, formation of new phases, and material redeposition [4,5]. Therefore, the alterations introduced by FIB milling can significantly impact the validity of experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPM maps the distributions of physical properties by simultaneously measuring tip-sample interactions and the topography [2][3][4][5][6]. Various SPM techniques are used for electrical measurements, including electrostatic force microscopy (EFM) [2,7,8], Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) [3,9,10], scanning capacitance microscopy (SCM) [4,11,12], and scanning spreading resistance microscopy (SSRM) [13][14][15]. These techniques measure contact potential differences [3,10], dopant concentration profiles [7,9], and local capacitance [8,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%