The impact of gender diversity on corporate social responsibility knowledge: empirical analysis in European context

Abstract

Purpose The Covid-19 pandemic has exacerbated social risks around the world, highlighting inequalities and eroding social cohesion in and between nations. The challenges posed by this global crisis to world governments can be overcome with cooperation between the public and private sectors. Several studies support the importance of external corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities in sharing knowledge with citizens and external stakeholders, with benefits for the company and for society. Few studies have investigated the relationship between knowledge management (KM) and sustainability. This work aims to investigate the influence of the gender variable in the sharing of CSR knowledge, focusing on the area of human rights. Design/methodology/approach The panel regression analysis was performed on a sample of 660 European companies listed over the years 2017–2020. The hypotheses tested in panel regression were then corroborated by a further test. Findings The results show a positive influence of women directors in the external disclosure of human rights. Evidence would assign a positive role to gender in sharing knowledge. Practical implications The findings offer new insights into the role of gender on KM and sharing. The results show that gender can be a factor that stimulates CSR knowledge. The presence of women directors can be a useful tool to increase the relational capital of the companies and to share knowledge outside the company. Originality/value The study contributes to the poor literature between knowledge sharing and sustainability. Evidence would assign a positive role to gender in sharing knowledge.

Cultural and gender diversity for ESG performance towards knowledge sharing: empirical evidence from European banks

“…Consequently, the presence of women directors serves as an external assurance of information that is more transparent (Paoloni et al, 2023), and internally decreases the level of conflict (Nielsen and Huse, 2010).…”

“…Competitors may find it challenging to swiftly replicate successful diversity and inclusion policies, mentoring programmes and a history of elevating women to top roles, and, thus, making BOD an inimitable resource. It is difficult to replace diverse viewpoints in BoDs and the potential advantages of GD with other resources, making it a non-substitutable resource (Setó‐Pamies, 2015; Paoloni et al , 2023). Thus, a gender-diverse board can be an important asset that boosts ESG performance and adheres to RBV’s core values by being a source of competitive advantage and long-term value development.…”

“…Some scholars have investigated the single effect of board diversity (gender and nationality) on financial performance in the banking sector without considering either the joint effect of the two diversities or the effect on ESG performance (Garcı ´a-Meca et al, 2015). In the field of knowledge management (KM), Paoloni et al (2023) examined board gender diversity (BGD) and found that gender is a substantial factor stimulating corporate social responsibility (CSR) knowledge. The study had substantial implications for the literature because it paved the way for gender, CSR and ESG in knowledge-management research.…”

Difference between genders in attitudes toward ethics in digital business. Evidence from Croatia

“…A crucial aspect of examining the impact of digitization and digital transformation at the company level is considering the ethical context where ethical issues may vary depending on the various types of moral dilemmas (Carrera & Van der Kolk, 2021). Over the past decades, the role of ethics in business, particularly in digital business, has increased in significance (Paoloni et al, 2023), alongside numerous studies on how to foster strong ethical climates by making ethical decisions (Glover et al, 2002). Research and discussions primarily focus on protecting personal data, emphasizing the fundamental importance of ethics in companies.…”

Public administration in smart city: A bibliometric analysis

“…To legitimize itself in the eyes of citizens, the public administration has to implement public services and improve the quality of life (Jung Hoon Lee et al, 2013). This is possible with the combination of technology, human resources and governance factors (Paoloni et al, 2023; Ruohomaa et al, 2019; Ullah et al, 2021). For this reason, public administration is becoming increasingly aware of the importance of using technologies to improve the quality of services offered to citizens and to develop innovative solutions for urban problems.…”