2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06458-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
68
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
9
68
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the studies of Hubacek et al (2009), Harris, (2010), Liddle (2013), Danish et al (2019), Alola et al (2019), and Danish et al (2020), in the present study, we intended to establish the nonlinear ecological footprint function, which enables us to obtain the common long-run coefficients for each determinant. In most of the Asian countries, economic attributes are visibly dominating environmental pollution (Sabir and Gorus, 2019). In this regard, by identifying the common determinants of the EFP, the study may enable us to extend the existing literature because the variables such as life expectancy and population density may have a significant impact on the established ecosystem (Alola et al, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the studies of Hubacek et al (2009), Harris, (2010), Liddle (2013), Danish et al (2019), Alola et al (2019), and Danish et al (2020), in the present study, we intended to establish the nonlinear ecological footprint function, which enables us to obtain the common long-run coefficients for each determinant. In most of the Asian countries, economic attributes are visibly dominating environmental pollution (Sabir and Gorus, 2019). In this regard, by identifying the common determinants of the EFP, the study may enable us to extend the existing literature because the variables such as life expectancy and population density may have a significant impact on the established ecosystem (Alola et al, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the weak prediction power of the traditional panel unit-root tests, we have performed the second-generation tests because these tests are more reliable in the presence of a cross-sectional association. The ignorance of the cross-sectional dependency may lead to unreliable results because macroeconomic variables tend to influence across regions and may lead to significant common shocks in the long run (Sabir and Gorus, 2019). If the study period is sufficiently long and the country-panel is relatively small, the Lagrangian multiplier test is apt for the stability examination.…”
Section: Data Stationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, EFs are relatively better environmental quality indicators in South Asia since the EF considers the other vital forms of environmental degradation [20][21][22]. Besides, among the recent studies that have considered EF to model the EKC hypothesis in South Asia [23,24], the critically important role of renewable energy use on the EF has been overlooked. Along this line, this study aims to bridge this literature gap since renewable energy adoption is expected to be crucial from the perspective of attaining environmental sustainability in South Asia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globalisasi mendorong peningkatan pada aktivitas ekonomi di setiap negara [1] yang dipelopori oleh berbagai perusahaan multinasional yang hadir dan berkembang dengan dibantu oleh perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi. Aktivitas ekonomi menjadi semakin melaju dengan digunakannya tenaga kerja mesin [2].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified