2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1526-4998(200004)56:4<320::aid-ps125>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of glyphosate-tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Sorghum halepense , reported to have glyphosate resistance elsewhere in South America. As herbicide resistant crops (transgenic or not) are increasingly deployed in developing countries, the problems of EHR will likely spread to those countries [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Sorghum halepense , reported to have glyphosate resistance elsewhere in South America. As herbicide resistant crops (transgenic or not) are increasingly deployed in developing countries, the problems of EHR will likely spread to those countries [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these effects are critically important given the increase in glyphosate-resistant weed species such as Palmer amaranth, johnsongrass, giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.), and goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.] throughout the midsouthern United States (Green and Owen 2011;Heap 2014;Osunsami 2009;Reddy and Norsworthy 2010;Riar et al 2011;Shaner 2000). Therefore, understanding the dominant routes, mechanisms, and rates of weed spread across landscapes is of utmost importance for preventing the spatial weed infestation and subsequent spread of herbicide-resistant biotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weeds emerging after a glyphosate application can fill niches vacated by the weeds that were effectively controlled by glyphosate. While Verschwele and Mülleder (2008) showed that risks for weed population shifts from GMHT crops are no greater than those associated with other herbicides and non-GMHT crops, other studies reported or predicted shifts in weed populations due the increased frequency and rate of glyphosate use in GMHT crops (e.g., Shaner, 2000;Hilgenfeld et al, 2004;Duke, 2005;Owen and Zelaya, 2005;Puricelli and Tuesca, 2005;Culpepper, 2006;Scursoni et al, 2007;Owen, 2000Owen, , 2008. A survey of twelve weed scientists from eleven states across the USA, to assess weed shifts in GMHT maize, cotton and soybean, revealed that no weed shifts were observed in GMHR maize yet, and that this was attributed to the low adoption of GMHR maize (Culpepper, 2006).…”
Section: Weed Shifts and The Selection Of Weed Communities Composed Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 6-year field study, Verschwele and Mülleder (2008) considered potential changes in weed communities due to the use of glyphosate in a continuous maize NK603 rotation at three sites in Germany, and did not observe statistically significant differences between local standard herbicide treatments and the glyphosate-based treatments on the mean values of seedbank, species richness, species diversity and dominance (see also Verschwele, 2011). With the anticipated increase in adoption of GMHR maize as well as application rates of glyphosate, more frequent weed shifts have been predicted (Shaner, 2000). While Verschwele and Mülleder (2008) showed that risks for weed population shifts from GMHT crops are no greater than those associated with other herbicides and non-GMHT crops, other studies reported or predicted shifts in weed populations due the increased frequency and rate of glyphosate use in GMHT crops (e.g., Shaner, 2000;Hilgenfeld et al, 2004;Duke, 2005;Owen and Zelaya, 2005;Puricelli and Tuesca, 2005;Culpepper, 2006;Scursoni et al, 2007;Owen, 2000Owen, , 2008.…”
Section: Weed Shifts and The Selection Of Weed Communities Composed Omentioning
confidence: 99%