1986
DOI: 10.1177/0364108286114004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Implementing a Quality Circles Intervention on Employee Task Perceptions

Abstract: This study utilized four plants of a large manufacturing organization to assess what impact implementing a Quality Circle program has on employee task and affective outcome response perceptions. The literature (nonempirical) supports the theory that employees' attitudes would improve following QC implementation. The Job Diagnostic Survey was used to obtain before/after measures on two plants that received Quality Circle intervention. In addition, two plants that did not receive QCs were used as comparison grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with Ledford et al (1988), QCs do not appear to have substantial effects on attitudinal outcomes. Some studies have found no effects of QCs on job satisfaction (Harper and Jordon, 1982;Atwater and Sander, 1984;Head et al, 1986). Cotton (1996) noted that, in general, QCs had positive effects on attitudes toward employee involvement and quality circles, but not on general work attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with Ledford et al (1988), QCs do not appear to have substantial effects on attitudinal outcomes. Some studies have found no effects of QCs on job satisfaction (Harper and Jordon, 1982;Atwater and Sander, 1984;Head et al, 1986). Cotton (1996) noted that, in general, QCs had positive effects on attitudes toward employee involvement and quality circles, but not on general work attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employee participation in organisations adopting TQM is implemented in the form of quality circles (QCs) (Sprouster, 1987;Powell, 1995), quality improvement teams (Juran, 1969), and crossfunctional teams (Ishikawa, 1985;Deming, 1993). An extensive review of the literature revealed that there is a paucity of empirical research on the effects of quality circles (Ferris and Wagner, 1985;Head et al, 1986;Ramsing and Blair, 1982;Wayne et al, 1986). In addition, most of the available studies were conducted in the 1980s, when quality circles were not implemented as part of a TQM program.…”
Section: Teams and Tqmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An understanding of the factors that promote individual participation is essential to the success of initial TQM efforts and the organizational change efforts. Second, experience with quality circles has indicated that they can fail to engage or sustain the individual's involvement with the programme when important organizational supports are not present (Head et al, 1987;Griffin, 1988). Even if the team has been successful in resolving specific work problems, the long-term impact in terms of organizational change could be jeopardized if the individual does not interpret the team's efforts as succesful, does not view his involvement as useful, and communicates these feelings to other organizational members.…”
Section: Why Should We Focus On Individual Staff Responses?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please direct all correspondence about this manuscript to: Tim Pollock, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 4255 Grainger Hall, 975 University Ave., Madison, WI 53706;608-262-1942 (voice), 608-262-8773 (fax), tpollock@bus.wisc.edu. (Dean & Brass, 1985;Fried & Ferris, 1987;Hackman & Oldham, 1976;Head, Molleston, Sorenson, & Gargano, 1986;Ibarra & Andrews, 1993;Judge & Hulin, 1993;Kulik, Oldham, & Langner, 1988;Rice & Aydin, 1991;Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978;Sims, Sziliagyi, & Keller, 1976;Staw & Ross, 1985). During the last 20 years, two schools of thought receiving a great deal of attention re-garding this issue are job characteristics theory (Hackman & Oldham, 1976;Sims et al, 1976) and social information processing theory (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%