“…Prior studies have also noted elevated Hg concentrations in piscivorous fishes extending great distances downstream of reservoirs, over 300 km in some cases, whereas elevated concentrations in lower trophic-level species were minimal or extended shorter distances downstream. ,,, The mechanisms underlying these patterns are unclear but have been primarily attributed to differences in dietary exposure, with piscivorous fishes able to feed on stunned, injured, and killed fish prey passing through the dam. , This does not, however, explain why elevated concentrations would extend further downstream, unless it is assumed that larger biological material (i.e., fish passing through the dam) persists further downstream than the smaller biological material (e.g., plankton) that comprises the bulk of biological Hg export from most reservoirs. , Although this could be true at shorter distances in some cases, it is unlikely to explain the differences over the distances observed. Alternatively, these results may reflect the incorporation of reservoir-derived aqueous MeHg into the food webs utilized by the larger fish downstream, though previous studies have found that elevated MeHg concentrations in abiotic matrices typically do not extend far downstream of reservoirs. ,, Because the larger fish are presumably older, exposure to even modest increases in dietary MeHg exposure over their lifetime may also be sufficient to account for the patterns observed. The lack of clear insights into the drivers of these differences is a substantial gap in our understanding of Hg risk in these systems.…”