Physical and psychological injuries are very common in the military but are stigmatized differently in society (Goffman, 1963). Across two studies (N = 427), we examined how masculine honor beliefs (MHB; i.e., beliefs about men’s values and behaviors, specifically that aggression is sometimes justifiable; Saucier et al., 2016) and beliefs in mental health stigma relate to perceptions of military injuries, with an emphasis on psychological injuries (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder). Study 1 explored perceptions of publicly recognizing psychological injuries in military honors (e.g., the Purple Heart), which historically have only been awarded for physical injuries. Study 2 examined participants’ personal support for injured service members through (hypothetical) monetary allocations to organizations prioritizing veterans with either physical or psychological injuries. In general, participants had favorable attitudes toward honoring and supporting service members with psychological injuries. In both studies, MHB and beliefs in mental health stigma were positively intercorrelated, as expected. Interestingly, MHB were not consistently associated with applying broader mental health stigma toward service members specifically, suggesting there is a nuanced relationship in terms of when this occurs. Beliefs in mental health stigma were consistently associated with more negative attitudes toward honoring and supporting service members with psychological injuries. This program of research has theoretical implications for the nature of MHB in perceptions of military mental health as well as practical implications in terms of who supports the military’s recognition of psychological injuries in military honors and how they allocate money toward helping veterans with these injuries, all of which advances stigma research.