2015
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1107045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of International Remittances on Child Outcomes and Household Expenditures in Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because of lack of technical knowledge, large start-up cost (NRs. 55,000, which is 28% of total annual household income), limited subsidies (only 45% of the households received it in the sample) and lack of labour in the communities to construct ponds due to massive out-migration of adult population for better job opportunity (Karki Nepal, 2016). Additionally, in these communities, farming is not commercialized and most of the farmers seem to be risk averse and do not want to shift from cereal-based farming systems to high-value crops due to production and market risks.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysis Of Rwh Pond Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of lack of technical knowledge, large start-up cost (NRs. 55,000, which is 28% of total annual household income), limited subsidies (only 45% of the households received it in the sample) and lack of labour in the communities to construct ponds due to massive out-migration of adult population for better job opportunity (Karki Nepal, 2016). Additionally, in these communities, farming is not commercialized and most of the farmers seem to be risk averse and do not want to shift from cereal-based farming systems to high-value crops due to production and market risks.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysis Of Rwh Pond Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this, many studies have investigated the impact of remittances on key macroeconomic variables such as: economic growth, investment, education, poverty, household consumption and education expenditures. Examples include but are not limited to Adams and Page (2005), Acosta et al (2008), Giuliano and Ruiz-Arranz (2009), Anyanwu and Erhijakpor (2010), Adams and Cuecuecha (2010, 2013), Nyamongo et al (2012), Imai et al (2014), Salahuddin and Gow (2015), Nwaogu and Ryan (2015), Kratou and Gazdar (2016), Karki Nepal (2016), Démurger and Wang (2016), Mahapatro et al (2017), Masron and Subramaniam (2018), Eggoh, et al (2019), Askarov and Doucouliagos (2020), and Cao and Kang (2020). These studies show that remittances boost economic growth and domestic investment, contribute to poverty alleviation, reduce income disparity, and increase household education and consumption expenditures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since agriculture in Nepal is mainly based on subsistence farming (Morton 2007) and is highly seasonal in the absence of yearround irrigation, labour shortages can occur during peak seasons and negatively affect agricultural output. When remittances relax farming households' cash constraints, families may simply choose to reduce farming activities, keep farmland uncultivated (that is, fallow) and purchase some or all of their food (Karki Nepal 2016).…”
Section: Introduction and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%