The Impact of ISO22000 Standard Diffusion on Agricultural Exports

Abstract

The WTO SPS Agreement sets a framework of rules that encourages harmonization through international standards. However, there is a lack of empirical research at the macro-level on how such international standards affect trade flows. This study conducts a general impact analysis on one of the most widely used food-related international standards in the world, the ISO22000, accounting for the different product types and country groups. The Codex Alimentarius Commission, one of three sister organizations of the SPS Agreement, notably participated in developing this standard that is based on its Food Code, harmonizing the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). This study employs recent developments in using the gravity model, along with uniquely employed additional specifications to enhance further the reliability of the estimates. Results show that ISO22000 diffusion negatively affects the exports of processed products that are the major export goods of developed countries. Primary and semi-processed products that compose the majority of developing country exports are not significantly affected, providing evidence against the concerns for the compliance burdens of developing countries when being certified to the standard. The burdens may depend more on the degree of processing of the exported goods rather than on a country's development status.

Technical standardization and total factor productivity in innovation-driven development: Evidence from China

“…Basic research, applied research, experimental development, industrial construction, market introduction, and technology dissemination may all occur in sequence. Technical standards that are well-matched might considerably hasten this procedure [ 7 , 45 ]. The following are the primary causes.…”

Does the internationalisation of China's agri‐food standards affect export quality upgrading?—Evidence from firm‐product‐level data

“…On one hand, standards provide consumers with quality information, which reduces information asymmetry and ultimately serves to promote trade. On the other hand, standards might inhibit trade by increasing firms' compliance costs (Kim, 2021; Swinnen, 2016; Xiong & Beghin, 2014). Empirical studies have therefore largely attempted to clarify the debate concerning whether standards serve as catalysts or barriers to trade.…”

Agriculture 4.0 and improving competitiveness of the domestic agro-food sector

“…More precisely, the implementation of the ISO 14001 standard provides a solid basis for sustainable development in the agrofood sector, where the environment is not uncontrollably exploited, but rather strategic actions are introduced in in order to comply with the ISO 14001 standard, which further increases environmental protection and preservation (Carrillo-Labella et al, 2020; Zhao et al, 2020). Standardization of finalized products positively affects exports of agricultural products (Kim, 2021).…”