The impact of James’s Varieties of Religious Experience on Jung’s work.

Melo, Walter; Resende, Pedro Henrique Costa de

doi:10.1037/hop0000128

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…G. Jung (1875–1961) has the next largest number of co-occurrences, and also co-occurs most frequently with James. James’s greatest influence on Jung was through the Varieties of Religious Experience (Melo & Resende, 2020), in which James (1902, p. 2) observed that “to the psychologist the religious propensities of man must be at least as interesting as any other of the facts pertaining to his mental constitution.” The psychology of religion was at least as important to Jung as it was to James.…”

Section: Creators Of the Anglophone Vocabulary Of Psychologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Creators of the Vocabulary of Anglophone Psychology and Their Relationships

Benjafield

2022

Review of General Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The vocabulary of anglophone psychology largely developed during the 19th and early 20th centuries. The creators of this vocabulary include such well-known names as William James, Joan Riviere, E. L. Thorndike, and James Strachey. Along with others, they invented many new words and word meanings for psychology. The more a psychologist responded to the need for new vocabulary the more likely were they to be mentioned in publications. Moreover, linguistically creative psychologists occurred together in publications to a greater extent than less linguistically creative psychologists, with William James having the most co-occurrences. A network is presented that links each member of a sample of 59 linguistically creative psychologists to the other member of the sample with whom they most frequently co-occur (e.g., E. L. Thorndike co-occurs most frequently with William James). For each pair, we provide brief descriptions of their similarities and/or differences. There is also a cluster of translators who created new English words and word meanings in order to capture the meanings of words in other languages that had no satisfactory equivalents in English. Generally speaking, the more success psychologists have had in filling the lacunae in psychology’s vocabulary, the more they have been recognized by others.

show abstract

Section: Creators Of the Anglophone Vocabulary Of Psychologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Creators of the Vocabulary of Anglophone Psychology and Their Relationships

Benjafield

2022

Review of General Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2020

2020

Isis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Notes on Usage and Other Resources Usage NotesNaming conventions. Family names are in small caps throughout the bibliography. Articles such as von, de, and della are usually not considered to be part of the last name, but this varies by person, country, and language. Unlike in past issues of the Bibliography, Asian names are given in Western order. Alphabetization is by last name of the individual with primary responsibility for the text.Cross-referencing. Cross-references are indicated with [ref.] throughout. Crossreferences to book reviews are identified by an R before the number, and refer to items in the book review section that follows the classified listing.Indexing of author names. In some instances an item will appear twice, once alone and once as part of an encompassing work (such as a chapter in an edited volume). In those instances, the author index lists only the independent citation.Subject index. The terminology used in the subject index corresponds as closely as possible to terminology already in use either in the old Isis classification system or in one of the companion bibliographies in the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine database (see below). New subject index terms are drawn from the Library of Congress where possible. Entirely new terminology is added at the discretion of the bibliographer.Book reviews. In the book review section, reviews are listed alphabetically by author or editor of the book. In the author index, they are listed under the author of the review, but not author of the book.Dissertations. Dissertations have been entered from the information in the electronic database UMI ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, a subscription database. General Note on Classification List of Abbreviations of Journals Cited in this IssueListed here are journals cited in this volume of the bibliography.

show abstract

The Social Character of the Unconscious. A Cross Reading between G. H. Mead and C. G. Jung

Bruni,

Santarelli

2024

J Theory Soc Behav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this essay is to develop an original interpretative hypothesis concerning problematic aspects of Georege Herbert Mead's social theory of the Self in the light of Carl Gustav Jung's analytical psychology. First of all, we will try to unveil a link between the Meadian component of the Self defined I and the dimension of the unconscious. Discussion of this connection will open to the hypothesis that the Meadian I can be understood as both an instinctive, unconscious and non‐pre‐social component of the Self. We will support this interpretative hypothesis by establishing a dialogue with two of the central concepts of Jung's analytical psychology, namely, the collective unconscious and the archetype. As we shall see, the main point of contact between the two theories lies in the identification of a common non‐pre‐social declination of the instinctive and unconscious assumptions of the conscious Self. More narrowly, we will try to explore this hypothesis by arguing for an interpretative affinity between the Jungian archetype and the Meadian social nature of instincts. Along these lines, we will propose a functionalist approach to the interpretation of the instinctive dimension of archetypes, according to which archetypes function instinctively. Our hypothesis of convergence between Mead and Jung with regard to the social nature of instincts and the archetype will lead us to sketch a peculiar and innovative social conception of the unconscious.

show abstract

The impact of James’s Varieties of Religious Experience on Jung’s work.

Cited by 5 publications

References 21 publications

Creators of the Vocabulary of Anglophone Psychology and Their Relationships

Creators of the Vocabulary of Anglophone Psychology and Their Relationships

Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2020

The Social Character of the Unconscious. A Cross Reading between G. H. Mead and C. G. Jung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About