2020
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1803474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of labour market institutions on income inequality: evidence from OECD countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although testing candidate explanations of the changes observed in the shape of the earnings distribution and returns to education in Portugal over the period 1987-2017 is beyond the scope of this study, another possible explanation relates to changes in labour market institutions (LMI), such as the minimum wage, collective wage bargaining regimes or employment protection legislation (EPL), albeit previous literature has reached no definite conclusions on the sign of these different contributions, see e.g. Checci and García-Peñalosa (2010) and Fortuna and Neto (2020).…”
Section: Endowmentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although testing candidate explanations of the changes observed in the shape of the earnings distribution and returns to education in Portugal over the period 1987-2017 is beyond the scope of this study, another possible explanation relates to changes in labour market institutions (LMI), such as the minimum wage, collective wage bargaining regimes or employment protection legislation (EPL), albeit previous literature has reached no definite conclusions on the sign of these different contributions, see e.g. Checci and García-Peñalosa (2010) and Fortuna and Neto (2020).…”
Section: Endowmentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Notwithstanding some recent changes, there is in Portugal an established gap in EPL between permanent and temporary contracts, e.g. quite lower severance pay for the latter, resulting in a segmented labour market that may promote wage inequality, Fortuna and Neto (2020). For instance, Silva (2016) studied the effect of the 2004 reform, corresponding to the extension of the maximum legal duration of temporary contracts, on the distribution of the within-firm wage gap between permanent and temporary workers and found evidence of an increase in this gap at the median and at percentile 75.…”
Section: Endowmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%