The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cancer screening participation in schizophrenic outpatients and the influence of their functional disability on the screening rate: A cross‐sectional study in Japan

“…Only a few studies have reported associations between cancer screenings and other factors in patients with schizophrenia . Previous studies of the general population (but not patients with schizophrenia) indicate associations between socioeconomic factors (such as educational level, income, employment status, and marital status) and receipt of cancer screenings . However, we did not find a consistent association between these factors and receipt of cancer screenings.…”

“…10,14 Previous studies of the general population (but not patients with schizophrenia) indicate associations between socioeconomic factors (such as educational level, income, employment status, and marital status) and receipt of cancer screenings. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] However, we did not find a consistent association between these factors and receipt of cancer screenings. In addition, the association between current visits to other physical outpatient clinics and receipt of cancer screenings varied depending on cancer site.…”

“…The SHEAPS was approved by the institutional ethics committee at the Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Okayama University Hospital (receipt number KEN1608-010), and by Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center (receipt number [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Potential participants were informed that they could refuse to participate or withdraw from the study at any time and provided informed written consent.…”

Five-Year Overall Survival of Interval Breast Cancers is Better than Non- Interval Cancers from Korean Breast Cancer Registry

“…The distribution of tumor characteristics between ICs and non-ICs overall was not in full agreement with other literature, with ICs being larger at diagnosis (Komenaka et al, 2004;Brekelmans et al, 2001), of higher grade (Domingo et al, 2010;Kirsh et al, 2011;Meshkat et al, 2015), and displaying more lymph node involvement (Musolino et al, 2012;Blanch et al, 2014) and more often being ER/PR-negative (Damiani et al, 2015;Musolino et al, 2018), HER2-positive (Martín-López et al, 2012;Musolino et al, 2018), or triple negative (Gilliland et al, 2000). As results, these studies have reported that IC tumors had, on average, a poorer prognosis of ICs than those of screening-detected breast cancers (Andersson et al, 1998;Collett et al, 2005;Sihto et al, 2008).…”

Conhecimento de mulheres sobre fatores relacionados ao câncer de mama

“…16 Diante do fato de que a falta de conhecimento sobre os riscos e as terapias pode levar a equívocos e à subutilização de prevenção e tratamento, justifica-se a importância deste estudo, sobre o conhecimento das mulheres acerca da doença e dos fatores de risco do câncer de mama, para subsidiar discussões que possam implementar programas e campanhas direcionadas a este público. [17][18][19] Dessa forma, questiona-se: qual é conhecimento de mulheres sobre os fatores de risco para o câncer de mama? E para responder a esta questão o objetivo deste estudo foi descrever o perfil e o conhecimento de mulheres atendidas pela Estratégia Saúde da Família sobre os fatores relacionados ao câncer de mama.…”