1999
DOI: 10.1149/1.1390809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Linewidth and Line Density on the Texture of Electroplated Cu in Damascene-Fabricated Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is likely due to the sidewall texture present in narrow Cu lines. 12 Upon in situ TEM heating, and in the case of 1.8 m lines, the nucleation of dislocations at Cu grain boundaries and consequent motion away from the grain boundaries during the first thermal cycle were observed ͑Fig. 2͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is likely due to the sidewall texture present in narrow Cu lines. 12 Upon in situ TEM heating, and in the case of 1.8 m lines, the nucleation of dislocations at Cu grain boundaries and consequent motion away from the grain boundaries during the first thermal cycle were observed ͑Fig. 2͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations into the microstructure and texture of Cu films and lines by EBSD showed a strong dependence of texture and grain size distribution on plating bath chemistry and line height to width ratio (Besser et al 2001, Field et al 2001, Vanasupa et al 1999. Copper lines were manufactured by the damascene technique in SiO 2 using a 30 nm thick physical vapor deposited (PVD) aN barrier layer and a PVD copper seed layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. Several bodies of research [20][21][22][23] have reported that the importance of the sidewall {111} component is increased in the narrow lines and the intensity of the overall texture can be minimized. However, in superconformal filling conditions where the bottom growth is much more dominant than the sidewall growth, such an observation is questionable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%