2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/361790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Low Muscle Mass Definition on the Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Older Australians

Abstract: Background. Sarcopenia is the presence of low muscle mass and low muscle function. The aim of this study was to establish cutoffs for low muscle mass using three published methods and to compare the prevalence of sarcopenia in older Australians. Methods. Gender specific cutoffs levels were identified for low muscle mass using three different methods. Low grip strength was determined using established cutoffs of <30 kg for men and <20 kg for women to estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia. Results. Gender specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
19
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
19
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the prevalence reported in the literature with our results appear to be attributed to the age of the population and to the methods used for the evaluation as well as cut-off points used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia [19]. Though, previous studies, remark the special value of comparison of elderly population with the subjects under similar characteristics, to reflect with precision the trend of sarcopenia prevalence [20][21][22][23]. Our study could be considered as one of the first studies referent to describe the prevalence of sarcopenia in urban community-dwelling older people in Latin America.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in the prevalence reported in the literature with our results appear to be attributed to the age of the population and to the methods used for the evaluation as well as cut-off points used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia [19]. Though, previous studies, remark the special value of comparison of elderly population with the subjects under similar characteristics, to reflect with precision the trend of sarcopenia prevalence [20][21][22][23]. Our study could be considered as one of the first studies referent to describe the prevalence of sarcopenia in urban community-dwelling older people in Latin America.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The cut-off point used in our study for low muscle mass is within the range mentioned previously (MMI <6.1 kg/m 2 in women and MMI <8.5 kg/m 2 in men). Additional studies in different populations need to be analyzed [20,21,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, these cut-offs have not been applied in men treated with ADT; however, the < 30 kg cut-off was shown to identify 8.0% of 5934 healthy older men aged 65 years or older [17]. In contrast, the prevalence of low handgrip strength using the same cut-off was 18% among 611 healthy Australian men aged 65 years or greater [46]. Therefore, our findings appear to suggest that men treated with ADT do not have compromised handgrip strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Model 2 additionally included BMI, smoking status, total number of comorbidities, depressive symptoms, weight loss and cognitive function. As the EWGSOP did not provide cut-points for low muscle mass assessed by CT, the 20th percentile was chosen for the main analyses as this cut-point has been used in previous studies [25,26] and the 10th percentile for the sensitivity analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EWGSOP does not provide CT cut-points for low muscle mass; therefore, the lowest gender-specific 20th percentile of the thigh total muscle cross-sectional area (<83.2 cm 2 in females, <116.5 cm 2 in males) was used in the main analyses and the lowest gender-specific 10th percentile (<78.2 cm 2 in females, <108.2 cm 2 in males) in the sensitivity analyses. The 20th percentile method has been used before in sarcopenia research using DXA [25,26]. Maximum grip strength of the dominant hand was measured by a computerised dynamometer affixed to an adjustable special chair (Good Strength software, Metitur, Finland), with the elbow flexed at 90°and armrests adjusted for height so that the shoulders were relaxed [27].…”
Section: Identification Of Sarcopeniamentioning
confidence: 99%