1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01544787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of mode of presentation on gender differences in social perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings demonstrated that men rated the female actor as more promiscuous and seductive than did women. This seminal study was followed by several others which modified the original procedure by increasing conversation duration, using confederates, presenting written vignettes or videos rather than live interactions, and adding an alcohol administration procedure (e.g., Abbey & Harnish, 1995; Abbey, Zawacki, & Buck, 2005; Abbey, Zawacki, & McAuslan, 2000; Edmondson & Conger, 1995; Saal, Johnson, & Weber, 1989; Shea, 1993; Shotland & Craig, 1988). …”
Section: Laboratory Investigation Of Precursors To Sexual Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings demonstrated that men rated the female actor as more promiscuous and seductive than did women. This seminal study was followed by several others which modified the original procedure by increasing conversation duration, using confederates, presenting written vignettes or videos rather than live interactions, and adding an alcohol administration procedure (e.g., Abbey & Harnish, 1995; Abbey, Zawacki, & Buck, 2005; Abbey, Zawacki, & McAuslan, 2000; Edmondson & Conger, 1995; Saal, Johnson, & Weber, 1989; Shea, 1993; Shotland & Craig, 1988). …”
Section: Laboratory Investigation Of Precursors To Sexual Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have included judging sexual interest or intent in face-toface interactions of opposite-sex stranger dyads (Abbey, 1982;Harnish, Abbey, & DeBono, 1990;Saal, Johnson, & Weber, 1989;Shea, 1993), videotaped interactions and/or photos (Abbey, Cozzarelli, McLaughlin, & Harnish, 1987;Abbey & Melby, 1986;Edmondson & Conger, 1995;Saal et al, 1989;Shotland & Craig, 1988), vignettes (Abbey & Harnish, 1995;DeSouza, Pierce, Zanelli, & Hutz, 1992;Haselton & Buss, 2000;Kowalski, 1993), naturalistic personal experiences (Haselton, 2003;Koenig, Kirkpatrick, & Ketelaar, 2007), and experiments (Maner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Biases In Mating and Romantic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory studies consistently find gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent, with men perceiving women as behaving more sexually and being more interested in a sexual relationship than do women (Abbey, 1982;Abbey, Zawacki, & McAuslan, 2000;Edmondson & Conger, 1995;Shea, 1993). These findings have been explained with theories of gender role socialization and the self-fulfilling nature of expectancies and stereotypes.…”
Section: Misperception Of Sexual Intentmentioning
confidence: 99%