2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36180-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of More Accurate Requested Runtimes on Production Job Scheduling Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially, users grossly overestimate their jobs' runtime. For instance, 50 to 60% of jobs use less than 20% of their requested time in four different traces [26], jobs on a Cray T3E use on average only 29% of their requested time [27], and 35% of jobs run less than 10% of their requested time [28]. Similar patterns are also seen in other recent workload analyses [1].…”
Section: Adaptive Allocationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Especially, users grossly overestimate their jobs' runtime. For instance, 50 to 60% of jobs use less than 20% of their requested time in four different traces [26], jobs on a Cray T3E use on average only 29% of their requested time [27], and 35% of jobs run less than 10% of their requested time [28]. Similar patterns are also seen in other recent workload analyses [1].…”
Section: Adaptive Allocationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…More sophisticated approaches propose dynamic backfilling priorities based on the current wait time of the job and the job size (LXWF-Backfilling [4]). -The order in which the jobs are moved to the head of the wait queue, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal was to evaluate the performance of these policies with specific workloads in HPC centers. A special effort has been devoted to evaluating backfillingbased ( [4] [22]) policies because they have demonstrated an ability to reach the best performance results (i.e: [12] or [21]). Almost all of these studies have been done using simulation tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net effect of shortening the queue gives advantage to jobs that have not yet been submitted since they find a shorter queue. Studies by Chiang et al [6] show that in aggressive backfilling, rarely does a backfilled job delay jobs deep into the queue. This implies that while the disadvantage affects a few jobs at the head of the queue, the advantages go beyond the queue.…”
Section: Relative Performance Of Job Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%