2016
DOI: 10.5296/ijhrs.v6i4.10300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Ostracism on Work Effort: A Comparison between Turkish and Azerbaijani Employees

Abstract: Ostracism is a critical issue with its influence on employee motivation, employee performance and hence on organizational success. The purpose of this cross cultural study is to investigate whether being a victim of ostracism in the workplace has an impact on work effort or not. Additionally, it aims a comparative examination of differences between Turkish and Azerbaijani employees in terms of workplace ostracism and work effort, with regard to factors such as gender and sector of employment. Results confirm t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive events (e.g., supervisory support) follow positive outcomes (e.g., improved performance), while negative events yield the opposite (e.g., turnover) (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996). Results of a recently conducted comparative study also confirm negative association between employees' perceptions of being ostracized and work effort (Türkmen, Doğan, & Karaeminoğulları, 2016). Thus, it is plausible to expect that; Hypothesis 1: Workplace ostracism will be negatively associated with work effort.…”
Section: Workplace Ostracism and Work Effortmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Positive events (e.g., supervisory support) follow positive outcomes (e.g., improved performance), while negative events yield the opposite (e.g., turnover) (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996). Results of a recently conducted comparative study also confirm negative association between employees' perceptions of being ostracized and work effort (Türkmen, Doğan, & Karaeminoğulları, 2016). Thus, it is plausible to expect that; Hypothesis 1: Workplace ostracism will be negatively associated with work effort.…”
Section: Workplace Ostracism and Work Effortmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Because high levels of effort expenditure are associated with numerous benefits at both individual (Latham, 2007) and organizational (Dubinsky & Skinner, 2004) levels, an understanding of what ‘prompts’ and what ‘impedes’ effort is essential. Only few researchers (Lloyd, 2008; Morris, 2009; Kirkhaug, 2010; Kmec & Gorman, 2010; Frenkel, Restubog, & Bednall, 2012; Sakurai & Jex, 2012; Amundsen & Martinsen, 2015; Türkmen, Doğan, & Karaeminoğulları, 2016) have so far endeavoured to answer this question. These studies, however, despite offering diverse perspectives, do not provide complete answers to the aforesaid question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bu çalışmada örgütsel davranış alanında son zamanlarda önem taşıyan konulardan biri olan örgütsel dışlanma üzerine odaklanmıştır. İlgili alanyazın taramalarında Türkiye′de örgütlerde işgörenlerin iş yerinden dışlanma algısını belirlemeyi amaç edinen sınırlı sayıda çalışmaların yapıldığı görülmüştür (Keklik, Saygın ve Kara, 2013;Çelik ve Koşar, 2015;Halis ve Demirel, 2016;Türkmen, 2016). Ancak Türkiye′deki örgütlerde işgörenlerin örgütsel dışlanma algılarını belirlemek için uygun ölçme araçlarının olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.…”
Section: Sonuç Ve Tartişmaunclassified
“…A review of the extant literature on WO, however, indicates a dearth of research with respect to its relationship with employees' work effort (WE), defined as "the extent to which one works hard and keeps trying to perform the given or chosen tasks" (De Cooman et al, 2009, p. 267). We know of only two prior studies examining the association between WO and WE (Anjum et al, 2019;T€ urkmen et al, 2016). Insights into how WO translates into decreased effort are also almost non-existent with the only exception being the study by Anjum et al (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%