The impact of policy instruments on the first generation of Tall Wood Buildings

Abstract

In a context of environmental concern and limited urban land, the construction industry faces the challenge of providing solutions for the increasing urban population both efficiently and sustainably. Numerous innovations on engineered wood products for multistorey buildings arise as one of the most promising solutions. In this context, various policies have facilitated the development of Tall Wood Buildings (TWBs). Yet, few publications analyse these policies and their influence on specific projects. This research aims to examine the impact of Policy Instruments (PIs) on individual TWBs qualitatively. Data collection is based on documentary review and semi-structured interviews with policymakers and professionals involved in 37 projects across eight countries. This study reveals that numerous TWBs have been facilitated by policies, acting through diverse PIs applied combined or in isolation. Notably, while Regulatory Instruments allowed TWBs in the first place, Research and Development Tools supported their development and approval process. Often, Research and Development Tools subsidised demonstration projects through Economic Instruments, after competitions or applications (Voluntary Policy Tools). Moreover, many Information Tools (e.g. campaigns, technical assessments) complemented other PIs. Remarkably, while some TWBs have become legal and technological precedents, technical information resulting from their development has influenced proposed changes in building codes.

Advanced Timber Construction Industry: A Review of 350 Multi-Storey Timber Projects from 2000–2021

“…It focuses on three analysis lenses: (i) structural limitation, (ii) envelope systems, and (iii) architectural massing. Wiegand's master's thesis in 2019 [37] examines the effects of policies on 49 case studies linked with CTBUH structural systems, and graphically displays the division, his later 2021 paper deals with the same topic on a set of 47 tall timber buildings [38]. The 2021 study by Žegarac Leskovar et al [39] contains only a list of 31 MSTB projects, and creates four lenses of examination: architectural, environmental, energy, and structural, based on previous literature [2].…”

Costs of Timber Houses in Different Standards and Productions in Brazil

“…This is assured by (58), who confirmed that prefabricated buildings provide more environmental benefits than on-site construction, i.e., essentially in terms of waste generation, materials and energy consumption, and carbon emissions. Moreover, (59) argued that engineered wood products arise as promising solutions to increase the efficiency and sustainability of the innovative construction. Therefore, companies must adapt their culture and processes to society's demands, since an innovative organization will undoubtedly generate long-term value and will be In general, when the construction of a green building is planned, it requires about 10 % additional costs, yet it should offer more than 50 % energy and water savings over its lifecycle (61).…”

Achieving zero carbon emissions in the construction sector: The role of timber in decarbonising building structures

“…The latter allowed the industry to manufacture products with improved uniformity, greater efficiency, and dimensional stability 29 . Since the construction of the first 8-storey wood buildings in the late 2000s, the building industry has completed around 50 projects over six storeys globally, leaping from 8 to 24 stories in 12 years (Figure 3) 30 .…”