“…Finally, consider ESS 2 (1,0,0) S , where the strategy set is {'cutting in line', 'tolerance', 'guiding'}, in which 'guiding' plays an important role in evacuation; though the university staff do not have a better way to prevent impulsive evacuees from cutting in line because of lower guiding authoritativeness or higher group-oriented behavior, they can do their best to form the queues into two columns instead of individuals gathering from all directions (easily forming arching at exits), and thus the crowds can pass through the exits slowly even though there are disturbances inside queues owing to the cutting in line. However, 'cutting in line' is beneficial to evacuating at times under certain conditions when calm evacuees act too slowly [22,25,27]. In a word, for the four ESS in our cases, the degrees of their being expected are…”