2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of predation risk and of parasitic infection on parental care in brooding crustaceans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that infected females maintained their level of care at the expense of allocating more resources towards immunity. Our results are similar to those of a recent study on the amphipods Crangonyx pseudogracilis and Gammarus duebeni (Arundell et al, 2014). In this study, infection by a microsporidian did not affect brood care behaviour or the duration of brooding of females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggest that infected females maintained their level of care at the expense of allocating more resources towards immunity. Our results are similar to those of a recent study on the amphipods Crangonyx pseudogracilis and Gammarus duebeni (Arundell et al, 2014). In this study, infection by a microsporidian did not affect brood care behaviour or the duration of brooding of females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…By maintaining their level of care, infected females may ensure that offspring receive the necessary amount of care and produce offspring with a similar survival and body size as offspring of uninfected females. This strategy might allow infected females to maintain their reproductive output (Arundell et al, 2014), but might come at a cost in terms of reduced survival and future reproductive success. Burying beetles can produce multiple broods (Creighton et al, 2009) and tend to gain mass during first reproductive, which is positively correlated with life span (Gray et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A secondary factor, which may drive males to breed with infected females, is competition from conspecifics. This may regulate and balance the parasite avoidance behaviour, allowing for reproduction but limiting parasite transmission [128]. Parallel studies in terrestrial systems have found that European woodlice (Armadillidium vulgare) females infected with Wolbachia sp.…”
Section: (D) Avoidance Of Infected Conspecifics and Matesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, given that gamete-mediated effects are generally weak across multiple meta-analyses [ 60 , 61 ] and that Steiger [ 27 ] suggests parental care effects to far outweigh prenatal effects, our hypothesis is that the impact of the parental care environment will far outweigh the impact of gamete-mediated maternal and paternal effects alone. Additionally, following previous research on the impact of immediate risk of parental care intensity [ 22 , 62 , 63 ], we expect that high-risk caring parents that were lifelong exposed to high-risk prior to parental care will likewise provide less care to offspring. Furthermore, as parental care intensity has been shown to directly modulate antipredator responses in offspring [ 23 , 24 ], we predict that parental care intensity may be a major mechanism that transmits risk across generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%