The Impact of Presidential Campaigning for Congress on Presidential Support in the U.S. House of Representatives

Abstract

Presidential influence is partly a function of the partisan, economic, and international context within which the president governs. Presidents are, however, more than bystanders relying on the political milieu for policy opportunities. Recent scholarship demonstrates that presidents consciously influence this milieu and build political capital by campaigning for congressional candidates. We contribute to this literature by assessing the effects of presidential campaigning on legislative support for two presidents who governed under extremely dissimilar circumstances: Bill Clinton in the 106th Congress and George W. Bush in the 108th Congress. We find evidence of campaign effects on congressional policymaking during both administrations.

The Politics of the 2018 Midterm Elections

“…Regardless, presidents still play a major role in these elections, even if their names do not appear on the ballot. In the end, midterm elections can have significant consequences for presidential administrations and their ability to pursue their agenda, political parties, and congressional campaigns and agendas (Herrnson, Morris, and McTague 2011;Sisco, Lucas, and Galdieri 2017).…”

Be Careful What You Wish For: The Impacts of President Trump’s Midterm Endorsements

“…The president’s campaign agenda may also be motivated by personal strategic considerations outside of improving copartisan performance. These strategies may be suboptimal for midterm performance but may provide longer‐term benefits for the president both electorally and legislatively (Cohen and Powell 2005; Jacobson, Kernell, and Lazarus 2004; Herrnson, Morris, and McTague 2011; Sellers and Denton 2006). 9…”

Trump on the Trail: Assessing the Impact of Presidential Campaign Visits on Voting Behavior in the 2018 Midterm Elections

“…Continual campaign travel and appearances by presidents throughout their first term in office, a feature of “the permanent campaign,” has become a “part of a broader strategy to generate legitimacy, build political capital, and gain leverage” for their reelection prospects (Cook 2002, 763). In terms of personal benefits to the president, presidential visits can have a positive impact on the president's state‐level job approval (Cohen and Powell 2005, 11), legislative goals (Herrnson, Morris, and McTague 2011), and favorable local press coverage (Barrett and Peake 2007). Collectively, such benefits help presidents grow their legitimacy, political campaign, and leverage.…”