2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijaape.2010.031612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of Revised ISA 700: an international empirical comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Correspondingly, auditors can issue a more severe modification by an adverse opinion or by a disclaimer of opinion [12]. In certain cases, the auditor's report content may be modified as detailed in ISA 700 [61,53,54]. The modification of report may be done either by appending an emphasis of matter paragraph or another matters paragraph while the auditor's opinion is still unmodified (unqualified), or by modifying an opinion, in cases in which an auditor alter his/her opinion to qualified or adverse, or issues a disclaimer opinion [114,115].…”
Section: Audit Opinion In Jordanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correspondingly, auditors can issue a more severe modification by an adverse opinion or by a disclaimer of opinion [12]. In certain cases, the auditor's report content may be modified as detailed in ISA 700 [61,53,54]. The modification of report may be done either by appending an emphasis of matter paragraph or another matters paragraph while the auditor's opinion is still unmodified (unqualified), or by modifying an opinion, in cases in which an auditor alter his/her opinion to qualified or adverse, or issues a disclaimer opinion [114,115].…”
Section: Audit Opinion In Jordanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The form of modified audit opinion obtained by Jordanian corporates are unqualified with explanatory paragraph (41.8%), qualified (57.0%), adverse opinion (0.53%) and disclaimer opinion (0.53%), as shown in Table 2. Based on ISA [52,61,53,54], external auditor issues a modified audit opinion because of three main reasons: (1) inadequacy of the proper audit evidence, (2) going concern opinion, 3) a mixture inadequacy of the proper audit evidence and going concern opinion. Table 3 displays the reasons why external the auditor issued a modified audit opinion.…”
Section: Sample Selection and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The harmonization of auditing reports is identified as the process, which aims at the reduction of the audit practices diversity and ensures their convergence in matter of the audit communicative means (Hussein, Bavishi, & Gangolly, 1986;Archer, Mcleay, & Dufour, 1989;King, 1999, Gangolly, Hussein, Seow, & Tam, 2002Fakhfakh & Fakhfakh, 2010). It aims at minimizing the divergences among the normative national regulations that govern the communications between the auditors and other stakeholders.…”
Section: Implication Of Results and Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth research stream examines harmonization of audit reports according to ISAs and concentrates on the degree of harmonization in the form and content of the audit report (Fakhfakh & Fakhfakh, 2010;Farrugia & Baldacchino, 2005;Gangolly, Hussein, Seow, & Tam, 2002;King, 1999). More precisely, on the wording characteristics of audit reports (Fakhfakh & Fakhfakh, 2007;Fakhfakh, Fakhfakh, & Pucheta-Martínez, 2008), the harmonization of audit reporting behavior in bankrupt companies (Sormunen, Jeppesen, Sundgren, & Svanström, 2013), and the linguistic performance and legibility of auditors' reports with modified opinions (Fakhfakh, 2016).…”
Section: Harmonization Of Audit Reports According To Isasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When examining IFRS compliance, prior studies indicated that there is an association between IFRS compliance and the use of ISAs. In addition, previous studies revealed that even when ISAs are adopted, several countries' audit reports are not perfectly conforming to the content and structure of reports standardized by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (e.g., Fakhfakh & Fakhfakh, 2010). This can be due to the inconsistent implementation of ISAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%