2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-014-2320-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of revised simplified Arakawa–Schubert convection parameterization scheme in CFSv2 on the simulation of the Indian summer monsoon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies [e.g., G14 ; Abhik et al ., ] have indicated that the convective processes are the major source of systematic biases in CFSv2. Some of these model biases, particularly the diurnal cycle, daily PDF and the seasonal mean precipitation, are found to be improved in the simulation of CFSv2 with the revised SAS convective scheme [ Ganai et al ., ]. In spite of these improvements, it still could not resolve the issue of a realistic ratio between convective and large‐scale rainfall over the global tropics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Earlier studies [e.g., G14 ; Abhik et al ., ] have indicated that the convective processes are the major source of systematic biases in CFSv2. Some of these model biases, particularly the diurnal cycle, daily PDF and the seasonal mean precipitation, are found to be improved in the simulation of CFSv2 with the revised SAS convective scheme [ Ganai et al ., ]. In spite of these improvements, it still could not resolve the issue of a realistic ratio between convective and large‐scale rainfall over the global tropics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This suggests that the simplified microphysics [ Zhao and Carr , ] in the model may not be sufficient to produce realistic large‐scale rainfall distribution and reduce the existing systematic biases of the model. To resolve these limitations of CFSv2, we have adopted similar revision of the existing convective parameterization (SAS) in the model as in Ganai et al ., []. Moreover, the Zhao‐Carr microphysical scheme of the model has been replaced by the WSM6 scheme in the CFSCR simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 of Sperber et al 2013). 75The limited horizontal resolution of CGCMs is frequently listed as a major 76 caveat because current coarse atmospheric models cannot properly resolve orography 77 2013) or convection (Pattnaik et al 2013, Ganai et al 2015, which all significantly 80 contribute to the total ISM rainfall, especially in the monsoon trough region. 81…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the new physics package also increased the surface temperature bias and negative wind speed bias throughout the atmosphere. Ganai et al [2015] evaluated the performance of several combinations of shallow and deep convection in representing the Indian Summer Monsoon using the CFSv2. They verified that the best configuration for representing the monsoon is the use of the New SAS deep convection scheme without using the SAS-based shallow cumulus.…”
Section: Journal Of Advances In Modeling Earth Systems 101002/2016msmentioning
confidence: 99%