The Impact of Sanctions Imposed by the European Union against Iran on their Bilateral Trade: General versus Targeted Sanctions

Abstract

The European Union (EU) has been using economic sanctions both as a foreign policy tool and as a liberal alternative to military action. Since 2006, it has been implementing general sanctions against the whole economy of Iran, affecting their trade relations, and since 2007, following the imposition of sanctions by the UN Security Council, it has also been using smart sanctions targeting Iranian entities and natural persons associated with the country's military activities. In a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model, this paper investigates the impact of general and targeted EU sanctions against Iran on quarterly bilateral trade values between the 19 members of the euro area (EA19) and Iran between the first quarter of 1999 and the fourth quarter of 2018. In a robustness NARDL specification, trade between Iran and the 28 members of the EU is analysed. In addition, a gravity model of bilateral trade between Iran and the EU member states is run in a robustness check. The results indicate that the EU's general sanctions have strongly hampered trade flows between the two trading partners in almost all sectors, except for the primary sectors. Furthermore, our study finds that the impact of smart sanctions targeting Iranian entities and natural persons is much smaller than the impact of general sanctions on total trade values and the trade values of many sectors. Smart sanctions affect the exports of most sectors from the EA19 and the EU28 to Iran, while they are statistically insignificant for the imports of many sectors from Iran. Thus, this paper provides evidence of the motivations behind smart sanctions, which target specific individuals and entities rather than the whole economy, unlike general sanctions, which have a negative impact on ordinary people.

Challenges in Containment: Assessing the Ineffectiveness of US Sanctions on Iran’s Regional Ambitions

“…Moreover, Iran has developed its financial messaging system, such as the System for Electronic Payment Message (SEPAM), and has embraced cryptocurrencies to sidestep international financial messaging systems such as the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) (Ronaghi 2022) . Despite sanctions, Iran continues to engage in trade with blacklisted nations such as Russia, China, and Venezuela (Ghodsi and Karamelikli 2022) . Additionally, Iran resorts to smuggling goods and services in and out of the country to evade sanctions effectively (Shahabi et al .…”

The experiences and perceptions of people with chronic and rare diseases during political-economic sanctions in Iran: a qualitative study

“…Since May 2018, the United States has unilaterally enforced sanctions to halt Iran’s oil revenue [ 5 ]. Furthermore, the European Union’s general restrictions have significantly impeded trade between Iran and its partners across various sectors [ 6 ]. Evidence indicates the devastating impact of sanctions on diverse economic aspects, including reduced public revenues from oil exports [ 7 ], a decrease in the gross domestic product (GDP), and an increase in the consumer price index [ 8 ], and inflation rate [ 9 , 10 ].…”

The Impact of Intangible Assets and Macroeconomic Factors on Stock Prices in Developing Economies

“…Due to the economic crisis in Iran, Saudi Arabia (KSA) and Iraq have experienced unfavourable economic relations with European nations and the United States due to severe economic sanctions. Sanctions implemented by the United States and other European countries have had a major impact on Iran's economy (Ghodsi et al, 2022;Ghomi, 2022). Sanctions in vital sectors like energy, finance, and trade have made it challenging for Iran to participate in international trade and access international markets (Mallard et al, 2020).…”