2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02887600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of sentencing options on recidivism among domestic violence offenders: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
15
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, more severe sentences were not uniformly more effective for reducing subsequent violence. Results for jail sentences conflicted with the handful of previous studies that uncovered either similar or higher odds of subsequent violence for individuals who were incarcerated in jail versus other types of sentences (e.g., Davis et al, 1998;Gross et al, 2000;Wooldredge & Thistlethwaite, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, more severe sentences were not uniformly more effective for reducing subsequent violence. Results for jail sentences conflicted with the handful of previous studies that uncovered either similar or higher odds of subsequent violence for individuals who were incarcerated in jail versus other types of sentences (e.g., Davis et al, 1998;Gross et al, 2000;Wooldredge & Thistlethwaite, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Gross et al (2000) found no differences in rearrest likelihoods for defendants with jail sentences (suspended or nonsuspended) versus other outcomes including advisement only, private counseling, fines, and probation (see also Davis et al, 1998;Wooldredge & Thistlethwaite, 2005). Finally, as stated previously, published findings related to imprisonment effects on subsequent violence are nonexistent.…”
Section: Relevant Findings From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Murphy et al (1998) found that increasing contact with the intervention (legal) system resulted in lower rates of domestic violence recidivism. Gross et al (2000) and Mears et al (2001) found no effect of sentencing option on domestic violence recidivism. Given equivocal results of legal intervention, several suggestions have been made in the literature.…”
Section: Directions and Considerations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Murphy et al (1998), no evidence was found to indicate that frequency and severity of prior assaults was related to recidivism. Studying a population of male domestic violence offenders who had been charged with misdemeanor offenses, Gross et al (2000) examined the effect of various sentencing options (e.g., advisement, other, community corrections, suspended sentence, and a jail sentence) on recidivism over a follow-up period of 18 to 24 months. None of the sentencing options were found to signifi cantly affect recidivism.…”
Section: Factors Related To Domestic Violence Perpetration Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%