2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10812-020-00949-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Solvent Polarity on the Stability, Electronic Properties, and 1H NMR Chemical Shift of the Conformers of 2-Chloro-3-Methylcyclohexan-1-One Oxime: a Conceptual DFT Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies also indicated that higher oil yields for aquatic products such as Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) were achieved with ethanol extraction comparing to n-hexane and acetone extractions (Gigliotti et al, 2011;Xie et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2017), which is in agreement with our results. There is no doubt that the dielectric constant (C²/(N•M²)) of a solvent is a convenient measure of polarity of a solvent (Milani et al, 2020). For example, compared with nonpolar organic solvents such as hexane (1.88 C²/(N•M²)), polar organic solvents including ethanol (24.5 C²/(N•M²)) are better for more consistent extraction of polar components (phospholipid and lipoproteins) from materials, and thus increase the extraction yield (Bauemler et al, 2016;Nichols et al, 2011).…”
Section: Extraction Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies also indicated that higher oil yields for aquatic products such as Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) were achieved with ethanol extraction comparing to n-hexane and acetone extractions (Gigliotti et al, 2011;Xie et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2017), which is in agreement with our results. There is no doubt that the dielectric constant (C²/(N•M²)) of a solvent is a convenient measure of polarity of a solvent (Milani et al, 2020). For example, compared with nonpolar organic solvents such as hexane (1.88 C²/(N•M²)), polar organic solvents including ethanol (24.5 C²/(N•M²)) are better for more consistent extraction of polar components (phospholipid and lipoproteins) from materials, and thus increase the extraction yield (Bauemler et al, 2016;Nichols et al, 2011).…”
Section: Extraction Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the solvent polarity can be determined based on its dielectric constant. Accordingly, polar solvents like ethanol (24.55 C 2 /N·M 2 , 25 °C) and isopropanol (19.92 C 2 /N·M 2 , 25 °C) compared to the nonpolar solvent such as n -hexane (1.88 C 2 /(N·M) are more able to extract polar constituents from natural substances, resulting in a higher EE [ 38 , 39 ]. In other words, the difference in oil extraction yields obtained from pure organic solvents (i.e., n -hexane, ethanol, and isopropanol) and their binary mixtures can be related to the co-extraction of any polar compounds, lipidic or not, enhancing the mass of extracted oil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post‐self‐consistent field calculations of zero‐point vibrational energy and Gibbs free energy were performed using G4(MP2), 34 B3LYP/6–311++G(2d,p), 35–37 and MP2/6–311++G(d,p) 38 . It is well known that the accounting of solvent during the investigation of fine structural effects is important 39–49 . Therefore, we estimated the effect of the reaction medium by using the polarizable continuum model 50 with B3LYP/6–311++G (2d,p) approximation.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 It is well known that the accounting of solvent during the investigation of fine structural effects is important. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Therefore, we estimated the effect of the reaction medium by using the polarizable continuum model 50 with B3LYP/6-311++G (2d,p) approximation. The following solvents were used: CCl 4 , CHCl 3 , CH 3 COCH 3 , CH 3 OH, DMSO and water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%