2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of strategic account managers' behaviors on relational outcomes: An empirical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The communality and redundancy coefficients are also presented in Table 2. These figures can be used in the same way as the R-square, as they reflect the relative amounts of explained variance for constructs and indicators (Guenzi, (Guenzi et al, 2009;Wetzels, Odekerken-Schroder, & van Oppen, 2009) and tt is defined as the geometric mean of the average communality and the average R-square, which range between values of 0 and 1. The goodness-of-fit values range from 0.61 for Attractions and Transportation to 0.67 for Hotels (average of 0.64), which exceeds the cut-off value of 0.36 for large effect sizes of R-square (Wetzels et al, 2009) and allows us to conclude that the models perform well across all six sectors.…”
Section: Study Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communality and redundancy coefficients are also presented in Table 2. These figures can be used in the same way as the R-square, as they reflect the relative amounts of explained variance for constructs and indicators (Guenzi, (Guenzi et al, 2009;Wetzels, Odekerken-Schroder, & van Oppen, 2009) and tt is defined as the geometric mean of the average communality and the average R-square, which range between values of 0 and 1. The goodness-of-fit values range from 0.61 for Attractions and Transportation to 0.67 for Hotels (average of 0.64), which exceeds the cut-off value of 0.36 for large effect sizes of R-square (Wetzels et al, 2009) and allows us to conclude that the models perform well across all six sectors.…”
Section: Study Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the t-tests indicated that non-response bias did not appear to be a significant problem. Based on the recommendations of Podsakoff, Mackenzie, Lee, and Podsakoff (2003), we also used various procedural and statistical remedies against the problems of common method variance and single respondent bias (Guenzi, Georges, & Pardo, 2009), including (a) guaranteeing respondent anonymity, (b) using established scales and questionnaire pretests, (c) using varying scale formats and anchors (e.g., strongly disagreedstrongly agree, neverdfrequently, highly dissatisfieddhighly satisfied, etc. ); and (d) Harman's (1967) one-factor test.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng et al, 2007;Ribeiro et al 2009). As Guenzi, Georges, and Pardo (2009) point out, such a research contribution is valued since it may enable a cross-validation of constructs widely used in previous research and not previously tested in a broader context. Our results show that the scales do work well in the Brazilian context, contributing to the literature and laying a foundation for future work in this area in such a dynamic market.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%