2018
DOI: 10.15196/rs080102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the 2008 financial crisis on household income and wealth in Visegrad countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We quantify the impact of the economic crisis on international circular migration relative to the pre-crisis period of 2006-2008, suggesting that the effects of the impact of the economic crisis are embedded in the differences in indicators between periods (Connolly 2012;Kiss 2012). We recognize that structural changes and the consequences of other forces play a role in the development of differences (Darvas 2011;Kocziszky, Benedek and Szendi 2018). However, according to the literature, the biggest macro force was the effect of the economic crisis (Galgóczi, Leschke and Watt 2012;Roos and Zaun 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantify the impact of the economic crisis on international circular migration relative to the pre-crisis period of 2006-2008, suggesting that the effects of the impact of the economic crisis are embedded in the differences in indicators between periods (Connolly 2012;Kiss 2012). We recognize that structural changes and the consequences of other forces play a role in the development of differences (Darvas 2011;Kocziszky, Benedek and Szendi 2018). However, according to the literature, the biggest macro force was the effect of the economic crisis (Galgóczi, Leschke and Watt 2012;Roos and Zaun 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. 2019: 13-31; DOI: 10.15196/RS090110 graphical distances completely blurred key information for investors and severely impacted the world's money and capital markets (see Figure 7) (Zsibók 2017, Kocziszky et al 2018. Source: Obstfeld-Taylor (2003).…”
Section: Efficiency Of Geographical Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Felvetődik az a kérdés, hogy Magyarország a közepes jövedelem csapdájával 3 találta-e szembe magát, mivel az alacsony költségek tekintetében már, az innovatív gazdaság, illetve a termelékenység tekintetében még nem tud versenyelőnyre szert tenni (Dijkstra 2017). A válság mint sokkhatás tehát átrendezte a növekedési folyamatokat mind országos, mind megyei szinten (Váry 2018, Kocziszky et al 2018. A válság után különösen Budapest és Pest megye veszített lendületéből, míg jelentős mértékű előretörés figyelhető meg Győr-Moson-Sopron, Komárom-Esztergom, Fejér, Vas, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén és Bács-Kiskun megye esetében.…”
Section: A Megyei-régiós Növekedési Pályák Alapvonásaiunclassified