2017
DOI: 10.1590/0102-6720201700010018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Meld Score on Liver Transplant Allocation and Results: An Integrative Review

Abstract: Introduction: Liver transplantation is intended to increase the survival of patients with chronic liver disease in terminal phase, as well as improved quality of life. Since the first transplant until today many changes have occurred in the organ allocation system. Objective:To review the literature on the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and analyze its correlation with survival after liver transplantation. Method:An integrative literature review in Lilacs, SciELO, and Pubmed in October 2015, was real… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the field of pediatric transplantation progresses, it becomes increasingly important to include other metrics beyond mortality and address them to mitigate risk factors and improve outcomes. For example, while PELD and MELD scoring systems have led to a drastic decrease in mortality, it has been shown that their implementation has actually led to increased costs and that the score alone is not a perfect predictor of post‐transplantation complications 5‐8 . Meanwhile, other variables have been shown to be associated with complications following surgery and, in particular, the post‐transplant LOS in the hospital 9‐13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the field of pediatric transplantation progresses, it becomes increasingly important to include other metrics beyond mortality and address them to mitigate risk factors and improve outcomes. For example, while PELD and MELD scoring systems have led to a drastic decrease in mortality, it has been shown that their implementation has actually led to increased costs and that the score alone is not a perfect predictor of post‐transplantation complications 5‐8 . Meanwhile, other variables have been shown to be associated with complications following surgery and, in particular, the post‐transplant LOS in the hospital 9‐13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patients must be seriously ill to warrant LT. Conversely, those deemed too well, often by MELD score, can be de‐listed or placed on hold. While the use of MELD has shorted time on the waitlist, time that nevertheless elapses may correspond to further decompensation of liver disease and a decline in KPSS, some of which may be attributable to age‐related factors, by the time transplant is undertaken . Moreover, implementation of MELD in the U.S. has since led to increased average MELD at time of transplantation, which would signify that such patients are at higher risk of mortality, but decreased waitlist mortality due to the allocation of grafts to sicker patients .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MELD score is incorporated only 3 objective variables, including total bilirubin, creatinine and INR. Studies has proved that the MELD score system could reduce the death rate in patients waiting for a liver transplantation, and downgrading MELD score can improve the outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure [15,16]. The Child-Pugh score, based on clinical symptoms of insu cient liver function (ascites/encephalopathy), and laboratory analysis of parameters of liver function (albumin, bilirubin, and PT) can be used to identify low or high-risk patients [17].…”
Section: Disccusionmentioning
confidence: 99%