2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4765723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the Pb(Zr,Ti)O3-ZnO interface quality on the hysteretic properties of a metal-ferroelectric-semiconductor structure

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inThe effect of the top electrode interface on the hysteretic behavior of epitaxial ferroelectric Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 thin films with bottom SrRuO3 electrode J. Appl. Phys. 112, 064116 (2012); 10.1063/1.4754318 Temperature induced change in the hysteretic behavior of the capacitance-voltage characteristics of Pt -ZnO -Pb ( Zr 0.2 Ti 0.8 ) O 3 -Pt heterostructures Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 012903 (2010); 10.1063/1.3284659 Off-centered polarization and ferroelectric phase transition in Li-dope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15] For this very reason, electrical and polarization boundary conditions (BCs) at the film-electrode interface become crucially important parameters that determine the functionality of these systems almost regardless of film thickness. Significant number of studies have been devoted to clarifying the effect of semiconducting properties of FEs on their hystereses, capacitance-voltage, and current-voltage behavior, 4,16,2,3,10,11,13,[17][18][19][20][21] where the only difference is apparently the consideration of an additional built-in field due to polarization inserted to the equations next to the built-in field due to the Schottky character of the junction. 10,11,13,22 A number of other works adopt thermodynamic approaches coupled with electrostatics and semiconductor equations for a given FE-electrode couple.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15] For this very reason, electrical and polarization boundary conditions (BCs) at the film-electrode interface become crucially important parameters that determine the functionality of these systems almost regardless of film thickness. Significant number of studies have been devoted to clarifying the effect of semiconducting properties of FEs on their hystereses, capacitance-voltage, and current-voltage behavior, 4,16,2,3,10,11,13,[17][18][19][20][21] where the only difference is apparently the consideration of an additional built-in field due to polarization inserted to the equations next to the built-in field due to the Schottky character of the junction. 10,11,13,22 A number of other works adopt thermodynamic approaches coupled with electrostatics and semiconductor equations for a given FE-electrode couple.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As documented in the literature, the C – V hysteresis for a MFS structure is a competition between ferroelectric contribution and contribution from charges trapped on interface states. [ 13,14 ] If ferroelectric contribution dominates, the C – V hysteresis is clockwise for ferroelectric on p‐type semiconductor and counterclockwise for ferroelectric on n‐type semiconductor. If the contribution from interface states dominates, then the orientation is changed, as it happens for HZO on n‐Ge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements, were anticlockwise for all the samples, and didn't exhibit any signature of a depletion layer, which would lead to an additional series capacitance leading to a decrease in the capacitance for one of the biases 14,15 . Below, we show the C-V measurements for the PZT0 and PZT25 samples measured at 10 kHz.…”
Section: C) Capacitance-voltagementioning
confidence: 99%