The Impact of Topic Characteristics and Threat on Willingness to Engage with Wikipedia Articles: Insights from Laboratory Experiments

Abstract

A growing body of research aims to identify the factors that motivate people to make contributions in Wikipedia. We conducted two laboratory experiments to investigate the connections between topic characteristics, perception of threat, and willingness to engage with Wikipedia articles. In Study 1 (N = 83), we examined how topic familiarity, topic controversiality, and mortality salience influenced participants’ willingness to engage with Wikipedia articles. We presented the introduction parts of 20 Wikipedia articles and asked participants to rate each article with respect to familiarity and controversiality. In addition, we experimentally manipulated participants’ level of mortality salience in terms of the amount of threat they experienced when reading the article. Participants also indicated their willingness to engage with a particular article. The results revealed that familiar and controversial topics increased the willingness to engage with Wikipedia articles. Although mortality salience increased accessibility of death-related thoughts, it did not result in any changes in people’s willingness to work with the articles. The aim of Study 2 (N = 90) was to replicate the effects of topic characteristics by following a similar procedure. We additionally manipulated uncertainty salience by assigning participants to three experimental conditions: uncertainty salience, certainty salience, and non-salience. As expected, familiar and controversial topics were of high interest in terms of willingness to contribute. However, the manipulation of uncertainty salience did not yield any significant results despite the emergence of negative emotional states. In sum, we demonstrated that topic characteristics were factors that substantially influenced people’s willingness to engage with Wikipedia articles whereas perceived threat was not.

Towards a Digital Reflexive Sociology: Using Wikipedia's Biographical Repository as a Reflexive Tool

“…https://www.wikidata.org (reviewed 9 September 2019). 5 To understand in detail the technological infrastructure, the normativity, the editorial stratification, the agency and the interaction dynamics of Wikipedia, see: Viégas, Wattenberg, and Dave 2004;Kittur et al 2007;Lih 2009;Yang and Lai 2010;Jemielniak 2014;Biuk-Aghai, Pang, and Si 2014;Clément and Guitton 2015;Tsvetkova et al 2017;Yenikent, Holtz, and Kimmerle 2017. rule also insists that editors should avoid self-promotion and advertising through articles. In general, these norms aim to ensure -with greater or lesser success-that all people with biographies on Wikipedia have significant coverage in reliable, verifiable, and independent media.…”

Blacklists do not necessarily make people curious about invasive alien species. A case study with Bayesian structural time series and Wikipedia searches about invasive mammals in Italy

“…These days, people regularly seek information online, particularly in those countries with good Internet penetration. Such behaviour is more common for those topics that are also debated in traditional media (Tizzoni et al 2020) and whose nature is controversial and open to multiple interpretations (Yenikent et al 2017), such as environmental issues (Anderegg and Goldsmith 2014;Burivalolva et al 2018;McCallum et al 2013;Mittermeier et al 2019). Information retrieval on the Internet occurs across multiple platforms, such as search engines like Google, dedicated websites and social networks.…”

Blacklists do not necessarily make people curious about invasive alien species. A case study with Bayesian structural time series and Wikipedia searches about invasive mammals in Italy

“…Today, people regularly look for information about topic they care about on search engines and on-line encyclopedias, such as Wikipedia [13] . This behavior also involves controversial topics that people want to deepen [14] and it often follows news exposure from traditional media [15] . This behavior includes environmental issues [16][17][18] [19] .…”