There is growing evidence of ride-hailing platforms' adverse impact on drivers. Nonetheless, hundreds of thousands of drivers continue to work on these platforms. Why? What considerations propel their continued usage over time? By drawing upon a qualitative study with auto-rickshaw drivers using Ola, a ride-hailing platform similar to Uber in India, we show how Ola over time shapes relations between itself, customers and drivers. The platform adds to the drivers' precarity and provides little benefit, and the platform's customer-centric design often leads to tensions with drivers. We illustrate how this has come about through the impact of ride-hailing platforms on the market: The duopolistic (Uber vs Ola) nature of the urban taxi market in India, paralleled by a shift of more and more customers from street-hailing to app-based hailing over time, has forged new dependencies for drivers on these platforms, which leaves drivers with little choice but to accept them. Thus, drivers continue to work for the platform, not because of any benefits, but because of the 'new dependencies' created by the infrastructuralization of ride-hailing platforms like Ola in the urban transport market. Our findings also reveal some ancillary benefits for drivers from their use of ride-hailing applications as first-time internet/smartphone users. The paper concludes with key implications for regulation as well as platform design that can improve customer-driver interaction as well as make the marketplace fairer, more equitable, and protect drivers' welfare.