2008
DOI: 10.1177/1094670508322561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Value Congruence on Consumer-Service Brand Relationships

Abstract: By integrating results from literature pertaining to social psychology, organizational behavior, and relationship marketing, the authors develop and test a model that explains how value congruence affects the key components of consumer-brand relationship quality and outcomes, including satisfaction, trust, affective commitment, and loyalty. Using structural equation modeling, they test the model with data from a survey of 1,037 consumers of clothing stores and banks in the Netherlands. The results show that va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
81
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
9
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the impact of internal cultural cohesiveness has been considered in the literature (see Berry, 2000;de Chernatony, 1999;de Chernatony & Cottam, 2006;Moseley, 2007), discussion has focused on the impact of cohesiveness on consumer perception of the brand and congruence between the values of the brand and consumer values (e.g., O'Cass & Grace, 2004;Zhang & Bloemer, 2008). The differing mindsets uncovered in this case study ultimately hindered the company in achieving the ideal of 'living the brand' (Ind, 1997) and whilst there was strong brand commitment (Burmann & Zeplin, 2005) at some levels, there were contradictory strains in priorities, as reflected in tasks undertaken and knowledge sought.…”
Section: Managerial and Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the impact of internal cultural cohesiveness has been considered in the literature (see Berry, 2000;de Chernatony, 1999;de Chernatony & Cottam, 2006;Moseley, 2007), discussion has focused on the impact of cohesiveness on consumer perception of the brand and congruence between the values of the brand and consumer values (e.g., O'Cass & Grace, 2004;Zhang & Bloemer, 2008). The differing mindsets uncovered in this case study ultimately hindered the company in achieving the ideal of 'living the brand' (Ind, 1997) and whilst there was strong brand commitment (Burmann & Zeplin, 2005) at some levels, there were contradictory strains in priorities, as reflected in tasks undertaken and knowledge sought.…”
Section: Managerial and Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loyal customer usually tends to pay more as well as spreading positive word of mouth among friends and family (Chaudhuri & Holbrook, 2001;Ismail & Spinelli, 2000;Lau & Lee, 1999;Zhang & Bloemer, 2008). This is beneficial for business performance of SME given they highly rely on customer recommendations to get new customers (Hogarth-Scott, Watson, & Wilson, 1996).…”
Section: Brand Loyaltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from that, SME brands with already limited financial resources will face higher probability of being eliminated out of the market when customers did not return to make repeated purchase given the high number of SMEs business establishment in the foodservice industry mentioned above. Therefore, it is vital for SME brands to capture loyal customers to ensure ongoing revenues and profits (Chaudhuri & Holbrook, 2001;Lau & Lee, 1999;Rauyruen, Miller, & Groth, 2009;Zhang & Bloemer, 2008).…”
Section: Brand Loyaltymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8, No. 3; relationships have referred to partnerships (Aaker et al, 2004), (Hennig-Thurau et al, 2002), (Garbarino and Johnson, 1999), (Schau et al, 2009), (Fournier and Lee, 2009), (Zhang and Bloemer, 2008); network, argued by Agndal and Axelsson (2002, p. 448), D'Souza (1993), McDougall et al (1994, Bell (1995), Poon andJevons (1997) andCoviello& Munro (1997); and in this point and CCII-Commercial Cluster Integration Initiative (Hu et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2006;Lai and Shyu, 2005). Table 3 summarizes the definitions of clusters in several aspects.…”
Section: Clusters Integration: Definition and Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%