The impact of voluntary and nonpayment policies in reducing early‐term elective deliveries among privately insured and Medicaid enrollees

Abstract

Objective To assess the impact of a voluntary pledge policy and a mandatory nonpayment policy on reducing early‐term elective deliveries among privately insured and Medicaid‐enrolled individuals. Data Sources/Study Setting Birth certificate data from 2009 to 2015, from South Carolina and 16 control states. Study Design We use a difference‐in‐differences approach to test the impact of two different policy types. Outcomes include the probability of an early elective delivery, gestation time, and birthweight. Principal Findings The voluntary pledge and mandatory nonpayment policy reduced overall EED rates from 13.1 to 11.4 (−12.7 percent, [P < .05]), and 10.9 ([−16.6 percent, P < .05]), respectively. Compared to the privately insured, we found greater relative decreases in Medicaid EED rate, the proportion of Medicaid births occurring before 39 weeks, and the proportion of Medicaid babies born with low birthweight. Conclusions Both voluntary and mandatory nonpayment policies are effective in reducing the rate of EEDs, especially among Medicaid enrollees. Given the high costs and poor outcomes associated with EEDs, policy makers may consider using either tool as a way to improve care value.

Group prenatal care successes, challenges, and frameworks for scaling up: a case study in adopting health care innovations

“…Value-based payment for prenatal care is isolated to a few state Medicaid programs in Ohio, Tennessee, and Arkansas [ 42 ]. In South Carolina, a quality improvement partnership between private and public stakeholders led to decreases in preterm birth, in part through enhanced provider reimbursement for group prenatal care [ 43 ]. Of the emerging alternative payment models [ 40 ], shared savings models that impact provider reimbursement could effectively offset costs of implementing group prenatal care through reinvestment at the source of care.…”