2013
DOI: 10.1134/s1995425513070123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of fires and clear-cuts on the carbon balance of Russian forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the governing climatic factors are solar radiation, temperature, direct effects of atmospheric CO 2 concentration and nitrogen deposition (Chapin et al, 2005;Ciais et al, 2005) as well as water availability and the seasonality of precipitation (Berner et al, 2013). Other factors relevant for forest productivity-impacts of which may be modulated by climatic conditions-are fires, insect outbreaks, and diseases that have been shown to counteract forest growth stimulation by increased temperature (Zamolodchikov et al, 2013).…”
Section: Forest Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the governing climatic factors are solar radiation, temperature, direct effects of atmospheric CO 2 concentration and nitrogen deposition (Chapin et al, 2005;Ciais et al, 2005) as well as water availability and the seasonality of precipitation (Berner et al, 2013). Other factors relevant for forest productivity-impacts of which may be modulated by climatic conditions-are fires, insect outbreaks, and diseases that have been shown to counteract forest growth stimulation by increased temperature (Zamolodchikov et al, 2013).…”
Section: Forest Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GHG balance of forest ecosystems was assessed using the ROBUL methodology [24][25][26], which assumes a balance approach based on accounting for carbon accumulation by different pools of forest ecosystems (phytomass, dead wood, litter, soil) and losses due to destructive disturbances (clearcuts, fires). Initial data for calculations are taken from the departmental statistics data of Rosleshoz State Forest Register [16].…”
Section: Research Methods Are Described In the Study Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GHG balance of forest ecosystems was assessed using the ROBUL methodology [27][28][29], which assumes a balance approach based on accounting for carbon accumulation by different pools of forest ecosystems (phytomass, dead wood, litter, soil) and losses due to destructive disturbances (clearcuts, fires). Initial data for calculations were taken from the departmental statistics data of the Federal Forestry Agency (Rosleshoz) State Forest Register [19].…”
Section: Research Methods Are Described In the Study Bymentioning
confidence: 99%